http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/business/19stanford.html?_r=1&hp<snip>
Years before the Stanford Group was accused in a worldwide fraud, American financial regulators found significant securities violations at the company that some experts say were telltale signs of deeper problems. But each time the regulators ultimately let the company off with relatively small fines, records show.
Experts said that the earlier violations amounted to a series of red flags of deeper problems. Officials at the S.E.C. said Wednesday that they were reviewing the regulatory history of Stanford, and whether the agency — often accused of lax enforcement — should have been more vigilant in this case.
In 2007, the S.E.C. found that the Stanford Group did not have adequate capital to meet the requirements of being a broker-dealer. The company paid $20,000 to settle those charges. Later that same year the firm was censured and paid an additional $10,000 to resolve accusations that it had provided “misleading, unfair and unbalanced information” about its certificates of deposit, according to records kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the agency known as Finra that polices Wall Street for the S.E.C.
Late last year, Stanford paid $30,000 to resolve a third set of accusations by Finra that the company had failed in its research reports to adequately disclose a variety of research methods and the way it was valuing certain securities.