Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question regarding MONICA(gate) taking the 5th

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:46 PM
Original message
Question regarding MONICA(gate) taking the 5th
Would she still have to appear in order to take the 5th? or could it be done through her lawyer in a letter form saying she takes the 5th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think they ought to put her through it.
They ought to ask all of the tough questions and make her answer each one with her little ditty. "I respectfully decline to answer this question on the grounds that it might incriminate me."

Make her go through that, simply so the American people can see what the transgressions are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it is like feddie court....
...she has to appear and to each question make the statement in regard to invoking her 5th Amendment rights. IIRC, one cannot make a blanket invocation...but I could be wrong on this.

Are there any other attys out there and ones who have more feddie experience than I do? HELP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they subpoena her, she has to show.
And now that she's basically admitted to being a criminal, Chimpy can't play the fishing-expedition card.

They should call her in and ask an hour's worth of questions, making here take the Fifth over and over.

I'll watch the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. an hour? oh no! Me with ALL this popcorn?
I want a marathon of at LEAST four hours. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, I was hoping we could skip the opening statements.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. ;) snicker
wonder if she will wear a blue dress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand what she has to hide.
This investigationn is about whether the USAs were fired improperly, so unless Gooding was the actual person who fired them, and EVEN then, Fredo is still responsible for signing off on it, what is she worried about, legally?

I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. as someone on another thread has stated, her lawyer (damn TRIAL lawyer!) will
prepare a statement saying that she will decline to answer all questions other than the name, rank, serial number variety. this is to spare her the embarrassment of having to plead to every question

I think she has to appear in person, though, and submit the statement to whomever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. i didn't catch the source, but isn't announcing in advance you'll take the 5th ..Obstructing Justic...
sounds like Rove told her to take the 5th on every question.. and she is reveling that

that sounds like Predated Obstruction of Justice

they will give her immunity.. and she will have to testify or go to the 'Pokey'.. so to speak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC