Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC is non-stop news this morning - UBS guilty of hiding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:15 AM
Original message
BBC is non-stop news this morning - UBS guilty of hiding
secret accounts for clients to facilitate hiding from US taxes.
Where in the world is Phil Gramm?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7898372.stm
<snip>
UBS has agreed to pay $780m (£549m) to the US government to settle allegations that it defrauded US tax authorities, the Justice Department has said.

In an unprecedented move, the Swiss banking giant has also agreed to hand over the identities and account information of certain US clients.

UBS was accused of conspiring to create sham accounts to hide clients' assets.

In light of the bank's acknowledging responsibility, the Justice Department recommended dismissing the charge.

The deal was agreed in a federal court in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. JACKPOT!!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm puzzled by
the constant reference to "certain US clients"

Makes it sound like Animal Farm with some more equal than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm mixed on this shit. I don't know how much 'revealing' will be done.
<snip>

Under the deal, which was approved by a federal judge in Florida, the bank must also exit the cross-border business in the U.S., change many of its banking policies, appoint new executives to oversee its tax compliance, and hire an auditor approved by U.S. officials to ensure compliance with the agreement. In return, U.S. officials will not prosecute the bank on charges of conspiring to defraud the United States.

<snip>



n court filings unsealed yesterday, prosecutors alleged the bank's conduct began in 2000 shortly after it bought brokerage firm Paine Webber. At the time, UBS allegedly agreed to comply with regulations that required it to withhold income tax from U.S. clients who set up offshore accounts. However, prosecutors allege UBS helped U.S. clients set up nominee accounts, or "sham accounts," and moved the money around in order to evade tax reporting rules. According to the court filings, UBS had 60 managers in charge of the business and ran it out of several locations in Switzerland.

Prosecutors allege UBS officials aggressively marketed the service, making 3,800 trips to the U.S. in 2004 alone. UBS employees used encrypted laptops and other "counter-surveillance techniques" to conceal the identity of their clients. According to an agreed statement of facts filed in court, UBS had 20,000 U.S. clients with roughly $20-billion in total assets. Roughly 17,000 concealed their identity "and the existence of their UBS account from ."

"Many of these clients willfully failed to pay tax to the IRS on income earned on their UBS accounts."
-MORE-

http://business.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090218.wrubs19/BNStory/Business/home?cid=al_gam_mostview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Now turns out
that they have divulged 250 names out of 17000. WTF is going on ? Sounds like lip service to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, why only a tiny fraction
of the names? Some people are more equal than others it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. IIRC, UBS was spunoff from the bankrupt Enron--Sen. Phil Gramm's "patron"
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 06:50 AM by Kolesar
Gramm did not run for reelection to the Senate because he knew his opponent would raise the issue and slaughter him. That would have helped to illuminate this story. Enron were pioneers in manipulating markets. Talk about a missed opportunity. Gramm's withdrawl gave the worthless media a chance to bury the story.

addendum: story Wed evening in LBN http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3745771
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for that link
Can't wait to see those names.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Have they mentioned any names
yet? This could get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. More Of "Why Daddy Went To Jail"
The deck of cards are collapsing all over and the real dirt is coming to light. Those exotic Swiss and offshore accounts don't seem so sexy anymore...especially if that money never really existed, you can't get your hands on it and now your name and financial history will be handed over to the feds. Talk about having spastic colon.

Yeah...where is Whinner Gramm these days? I just shudder at the thought that he'd be at the helm of the treasury had Gramps been elected. I'm hoping we find his name on a bunch of bogus accounts...he ends up in club fed like the racateer he's always been.

I wonder how much "Sir" Allen Stanford had in this scheme.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC