Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing CEO Says Pay Freeze Counterproductive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:51 AM
Original message
Boeing CEO Says Pay Freeze Counterproductive
Wednesday, February 18, 2009 – updated: 3:39 pm PST February 18, 2009
SEATTLE -- Freezing wages and eliminating bonuses to avoid layoffs would be counterproductive for Boeing Co. and other big employers, the aerospace company's chief executive said.

In an e-mail Tuesday to Boeing employees, printed in full on the Web site of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper Wednesday, CEO Jim McNerney wrote that such moves would hurt the company's ability to attract and retain high-performing employees.

The memo is one of the first responses by a major corporate chief executive to proposals for layoff alternatives. Such requests have gained force in the deepening recession since President Barack Obama praised "the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job" in his inaugural address last month.

"More than a few of you have written to me asking whether we could avoid layoffs altogether by not paying incentive awards this year or by freezing wages across the board," McNerney noted.

http://www.kirotv.com/money/18742767/detail.html#-


Does anyone else think he is only looking in the mirror at himself and other ilk like him that are greedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cry me a river.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just doing away with golden parachutes for execs who run a company to the ground
would be a good move. Tie pay for senior management to performance;no more of this rewarding failure in corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's the scam
Each company says that if they paid their top execs less, they would lose them and then have less effective management because they can't attract anyone else. Then it's self-fulfilling. But what if other companies started trying to spend less on top management? Then they'd have nowhere else to go, so they'd just accept a modest $2 million per year instead of saying they're underpaid and need $20 million. Unfortunately, all the executives at all the major companies are reinforcing the current approach by continuing to do what they can to not just help themselves but to prop up this whole system that benefits them and those like them.

Hey, isn't this just what unions are supposed to do for workers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. But if everyone's doing it, Mr. McNerney
Where are all those "valuable" employees going to go? I mean, hyper-inflated salaries and outlandish bonuses for running a company into the ground surely affect a business' bottom line. And if the workers have been sacrificing for decades of higher productivity while wages have shrunk relative to inflation, isn't it about time the Big Boys in the executive suites pitched in, too?

Your employees are stuck in wage slavery; what would or could you buy with a fatter salary or a huge bonus that you can't buy now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let the greedy ones go look for another fucking job. Kiss off, McNerney. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. He is missing the point because.............
he only thinks of the money therefore he rationalizes. The point is the message he sends to his employees, customers, and future highly productive employees. He would be showing that the welfare of his company and employees is more important than a short term gain for a few. It would also attract more productive employees because it would show the loyalty the management has towards it's workers.
His basic cockeyed thinking is what got this nation into this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. His point??
Is that upper management can not be replaced without serious harm.

While everyone else is easily replaced with no impact on the company.

That upper management can not afford a pay freeze or cut. While everyone else can. Including the lowest paid person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. there are a lot of high performers not prima donnas that would probably
out perform most CEOs today - hachet guys now that is another story or heartless - there are a lot of them too - just look at most republican politicians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Boy needs to take his shades off....
Lots of CEO's will be looking for a job.

Another words, their jobs are just like all the others. They need to look at it the same as everyone else. When they get a pay cut, then need to be thankful they still have a job. Cause that IS the next option.

It's amazing the how big these egos are. It's so big, they can not imagine everything 'working' without them. Snort! Well, that is what they want everyone else to think. IT's fear mongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC