Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton says Glass-Steagall was irrelevant....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:48 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton says Glass-Steagall was irrelevant....
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2009/02/bill-clinton-i-should-have-better-regulated-derivatives.html

...if was not part of the problem, why was it necessary to have it repealed under Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, sorry about that Big Dog but you are full of shit on this one...
...it wasn't THE cause of this mess....but it sure helped...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Worried bout his legacy much lately?
Can't own up to his part of any of the deregulation disasters.

Shocker. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bill Clinton is being dishonest to protect his legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. yeah...and he was 'against' the Iraq war during Hillary's primary run hoping no one would remember
that he is the one who urged Tony Blair and Dem lawmakers to support Bush's decisions on Iraq, and even used his summer2004 book tour to vigorously defend Bush publicly throughout his 3 weeks of high profile interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. he`s a coward for not owning up to his signature...
repealing the last new deal banking reform act. clinton knew what he was doing when he signed it.

so a big fuck you bill

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Have to agree that Bill is wrong and would be more impressed if he fessed up
He's smart guy - he knows better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. "Knowing better".....
...never stopped "The Big Dog".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. The complete absence of oversight and negligence of basic regulation 2000-08 was the real problem.
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 10:03 AM by Captain Hilts
I don't like it either and I saw an article cited here where he did express regret, as well he should.

But if Gore had been prez, this wouldn't have happened.

I remember discussing this 'reform' with my financial adviser at the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It was a timebomb eroding the system. No matter who was President,
consequences were forthcoming. Bush just added the final blow with expansion of crony capitalism but systemic problems were already in the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Nobel Laureate disagrees- three things happened under Clinton on his list
Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz adds other culprits as crucial to the making of the current economic crisis. Among them:

1) the April 1998, decision of President Clinton's Working Group on Financial Markets to quash a proposal by Brooksley E. Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to regulate derivatives;
(happened under Clinton)

2) enactment of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act on November 12, 1999 allowing consolidation of commercial and investment banks;(Clinton)

3) passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 removing derivatives from federal oversight;
Clinton's term


4) the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003;

5) the failure of the Federal Reserve to take responsibility for regulating derivatives; and

6) the Securities and Exchange Commission decision in April, 2004, to allow large investment banks to increase their debt-to-capital ratio from 12 to 1 to 30 to 1, or higher.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/19/alan-greenspan-the-oracle_n_168168.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Thanks for this - it is a really good summary of complex causes nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. I'm a Stiglitz fan too.
It wasn't quite a 'perfect storm', but close. And, I am just not ready to let the Bush Admin - knowing their complete lack of interest in managing ANYTHING regulatory - so easily off the hook.

I mean, do we really think the same thing would have happened under Prez. Gore?

I'll have to find the reference I saw here about Clinton expressing regret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. He made it easier and possible
Removing that wall was one of the big first steps in creating the problem. The Commodity Futures Modernization which was also backed by Clinton and added to an appropriations bill was a second problem - it kept swaps and derivatives from being regulated. (In fairness, Greenspan, Gramm and Rubin all advised him to do these things.)

It is true though that Cox by allowing leverage to go to ratios like 1:44 (from 1:12) exasperated this - and it is true that the oversight was awful.

Clinton's comment is analogous to someone leaving the door to a house, that was robbed 12 hours later, wide open - saying that he was not responsible. It is true that others could have closed it in the intervening hours or that someone else could have caught the thief - and of course, the door opener had no relationship to the thief - but he set up the conditions that enabled things that couldn't have happened otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. bull shit - maybe all presidents can't see the errors of their ways or
how they impact things with their narrow focus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Afraid people will catch on before he dies?
Think of it, allowed health care to continue to disintegrate, finalized media consolidation, destroyed the final remnants of what remained of our welfare system, allowed the financial sector to escape any oversight, crippled the burgeoning technology sector.

Hell, all Idiot frat boy had to do was reverse his tax increase and throw a little more money at the parasites to finish destroying the nation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You forgot NAFTA
He was proud that he got that passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're right, I did.
Continuing and accelerating the policies that had already failed twice in twelve years before he came to office doesn't seem like such a great idea anymore, does it Bill?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. All those jobs we lost to China because of NAFTA! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Er, Clinton also signed the bill that gave "permanent normal trade" relations with China. FYI. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Not NAFTA, those jobs went to Mexico first, and THEN to Asia.
Granting China MFN status is what sent our jobs to China. (Bill Clinton, 1994)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. The names GRAMM and BLILEY tell you everything you need to
know.

To think that if the GOP had won this election, Gramm was being
considered for Sec.Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. So when did he start taking money from the bankers?
:shrug:

I wonder how many Clinton Global Initiative donations are from rich NY investment bankers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Citigroup and Bill Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton is wrong - and he likely knows it
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 10:53 AM by karynnj
Removing that wall was one of the big first steps in creating the problem. The Commodity Futures Modernization which was also backed by Clinton and added to an appropriations bill was a second problem - it kept swaps and derivatives from being regulated. (In fairness, Greenspan, Gramm and Rubin all advised him to do these things.)

This is just a case of "hot potato" where no one wants to end up holding any of the blame. These two actions by Clinton, both of which reflect a view that regulation is not needed hurt. It is true though that Cox by allowing leverage to go to ratios like 1:44 (from 1:12) exasperated this.

Clinton's comment is analogous to someone leaving the door to a house, that was robbed 12 hours later, wide open- saying that he was not responsible. It is true that others could have closed it in the intervening hours or that someone else could have caught the thief - and of course, the door opener had no relationship to the thief - but he set up the conditions that enabled things that couldn't have happened otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. of course he knows it. He is a smart guy
and dishonest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I agree - on both counts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Eh, not quite.
Yes, Reagan and Bush I did a good job hacking away at the bill during their administrations, but Clinton's repeal of it certainly didn't help things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. Clinton's wrong on this one. I stil ldon't know why Congress doesn't reinstitute it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'll bet Thom Hartmann will have a thing or two to say about this
I'll be sure to listen today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
25. THIS is worse than an extra marital Blowjob
any day!!!

Fuck You Bill... Glass/Seagall was there to PREVENT this mess.

Aiding and abetting greed, looking out for your role... shameful

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bill is covering his own ass again.
Irrelevant? Hardly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC