Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ban on mountaintop mining overturned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:28 PM
Original message
Ban on mountaintop mining overturned
19 February 2009
Magazine issue 2696.

EVEN as public opinion in the US turns against coal, judges have overturned a ban on blasting away mountaintops to get at seams.

In the central Appalachians, including West Virginia, mining companies have lopped up to 300 metres off hundreds of mountains, destroying biologically diverse hardwood forest. The debris is often dumped into valleys, sometimes burying streams in the process.

A lawsuit filed by the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (OVEC) based in Huntington, West Virginia, argued that such valley fills violate the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, and a US district court ruled in their favour in March 2007. But on 13 February, a Court of Appeals panel voted 2:1 to reverse the decision.

OVEC is now deciding whether to go to the US Supreme Court. "Meanwhile, we will redouble our efforts to educate the public on this national disgrace," says Vivian Stockman, OVEC project coordinator.

more:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126963.900-ban-on-mountaintop-mining-overturned.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. It'll go to the supreme court.
I'm not thrilled about the situation, but it's not finished working its way through the courts yet, so I'm not overly worried, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Except there are 4 votes certain to uphold this decision
So the whole thing comes down to Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is totally the wrong decision.
Obviously the judges didn't watch "Burning the Future: Coal in America." http://www.burningthefuture.org/show.asp?content_id=14089

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC