I do love that man, and I don't miss his State Of Belief on AAR on Sundays. If our church had a pastor like him, hubby and I would not have quit attending. He speaks for a compassionate, caring, and intelligent type of religion.
He has been quite critical of Barack Obama for keeping some of the aspects of Bush's Faith Based programs.
He recently had a column in the Washington Post/Newsweek in which he differed with Rev. Jim Wallis on the issue.
Discrimination With Federal Money
Speculation is as rampant as opinions are diverse regarding a final decision on the legality of religious discrimination in hiring practices funded by government money. As President Obama elaborated his vision of a faith-based and community partnership, supporters of the program debated whether to expand or narrow civil rights guarantees among recipients of "faith-based" funds.
I was a bit surprised and more than a little perplexed when I read Jim Wallis' published comments on this issue this past Thursday. The leader of Sojourners, downplayed the significance of the hiring issue, indicating it came up only once in transition meetings. According to Jim, poverty, human trafficking and the Middle East were discussed in much more detail. That certainly was not my experience. Since December of 2008, I was in numerous meetings with the Obama Transition Team both singularly as president of Interfaith Alliance and as a member of a broad-based coalition that works on issues of religious liberty. Literally, I never was in a meeting of the faith-based office in which non-discrimination laws were not discussed.
Please make no mistake about the importance of this provision in the new office of Faith Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. If sectarian organizations are using their own money, they have every right to employ only persons committed to their religion. However, if taxpayers are funding a program, that program should reflect our nation's historic commitment to civil rights.
I appreciate the good work Jim Wallis does and his desire to do more, but ultimately we swap a temporary good for a long-lasting problem if we do not establish safeguards in hiring practices and direct funding of faith based groups. I agree with Jim on the importance of eradicating poverty, fostering inter-religious cooperation, and a number of other goals. But we must not weaken the Constitution that serves as the strong foundation for protecting the integrity of religion and the vitality of democracy.
If we had a pastor like that we might consider church again. But we can not handle the narrow bigotry that passes for religion in our area.
He was a breath of fresh air tonight on her show.