Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BRAC planning continues despite Walter Reed bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:39 PM
Original message
BRAC planning continues despite Walter Reed bill
http://www.examiner.com/a-639057~BRAC_planning_continues_despite_Walter_Reed_bill.html

BRAC planning continues despite Walter Reed bill


WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Suburban D.C. officials who are navigating how to absorb the closure of Walter Reed Army Medical Center have not stalled their efforts in the face of the U.S. House’s passage of a bill to keep the hospital open.

The measure, which would bar the use of funds to close the troubled D.C. medical facility, is tagged onto a $124 billion supplemental Iraq spending bill that passed 218-212 on Friday. But the full Senate has not yet voted on the bill, which faces the promise of a veto from the president, who opposes provisions that would mandate a 2008 troop withdrawal.

The legislation has left uncertain the future of Walter Reed and the two military hospitals in the region that would take on its functions after its proposed 2011 closure. Walter Reed is slated to close under the military’s 2005 Base Realignment and Closure mandate, with its functions transferring to Bethesda National Naval Medical Center and Fort Belvoir’s DeWitt Hospital in Fairfax County. The proposal to keep Walter Reed open emerged after a scandal involving neglect of soldiers in outpatient care surfaced.

has a long way to go in Congress, and the president seems to be firmly committed to the BRAC decisions that were made in 2005, which he signed into law,” said William Bronrott, a Maryland delegate who sits on a BRAC planning committee in Montgomery County. “It’s pretty much just speculation as to what this might or might not mean for the merging of Walter Reed and National Naval Medical Center.”

He said the planning for the expansion at Bethesda continues; they are still expecting a broad environmental impact statement from the military that would shed light on the effect of the shift. Officials in Virginia have also said they plan to move forward with BRAC hospital planning.

The National Naval Medical Center is slated to expand by 1.1 million square feet and 1,400 new staff members. DeWitt Hospital would expand from 45 beds to 120 and take on a variety of new functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Assuming we are out of Iraq in a reasonable time frame WRAMC should be BRACed
The BRAC process was a rigorous and as politically independent as you can get in Washington. Lots of facilites are being closed and consolidated. Unless there is active fighting going on, the right thing is to close it.

Note that until the Senate concurs, BRAC is still law and WRAMC will close. Stopping the planning now would be premature.

Many here are astonished at the number of bases the US military has. WRAMC is counted as one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC