|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 09:02 PM Original message |
To those whining about the "enviromental impact" and "hypocrisy "of Edwards' new home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonH (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hush yo mouth! Elizabeth can only be appreciated when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thank you John Locke. Some folks should be feeling pretty stupid-head right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Kick (nt). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Better yet, forget about John's house.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. Makes you wonder if these critics of John Edwards Are Pushing Another Candidate.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. We know nothing about his Iran-war rhetoric? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaronbees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. Good for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pandrmn (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes, good for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Pandrmn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pandrmn (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:55 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Gracias! Que revoluciones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
54. There's a revolution in Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Yes, welcome, Pandrmn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaronbees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
30. Yes, how awful of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pandrmn (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
65. By your comments, you agree with capatalism and disagree with tort reforms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaronbees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Like I said.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
39. I doubt Valerie Lakey would agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pandrmn (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #39 |
66. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
50. how many other politicians live the capitalist good life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greendog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. How much energy is it going to take... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Can you please resize that pic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greendog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Sorry about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Thanks so much! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I don't see a lawn, but they could use some landscaping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That's how my sister mows her lawn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
31. The horses do a great job. My neighbor's two horses who graze |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greendog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Perhaps a small herd of donkeys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. It's for the polo ponies.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
89. Let most of it stay meadow, don't mow it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
12. The nice thing about not being on Bill O'Reilly's show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
16. STFU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #16 |
25. And that the Edwards PR people told him to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Wow. I've never seen someone make up so much shit about Elizabeth Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
57. Wow...I feel as if I've returned to the playground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. Can you back that statement up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. I'm sure that Elizabeth writes everything herself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Me too. I was neutral about the house, but this note hits me wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. What, compact fluorescent bulbs don't an environmental hero make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 03:10 AM Response to Reply #29 |
70. Well, not when you lie about them.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Are forest fires a big issue in the Carolinas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 03:08 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Forest fires are an issue in the Amazon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 06:08 AM Response to Reply #74 |
82. this area of Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #82 |
87. Ah ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. No not the screenwriter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. Not the screenwriter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. oh yeah....the Swamp Fox LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #16 |
32. Yeah this message from Edwards is rather insulting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. I also will not "STFU" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
17. SO they're using 30% less power than a noramal home? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Or a drafty older home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. No, it's *at least* 30 percent *for the Energy Star designation.* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
19. STFU? Since when? That house is a mcmansion and I do believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeunderdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
59. Uh....A McWhopperMansion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Um...see post #41. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 02:21 AM Response to Reply #59 |
69. They must be freaking out about the negative attention this house is getting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
21. Wow, I had no idea that all it took was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. What do you need, stigmata? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. Lemme get this straight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
27. I am more concerned about his views on Israel, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
33. Lets not confuse ourselves with facts now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forrest Greene (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
34. Stop Whining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Thanks for your substantive comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forrest Greene (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. And The Very Same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forrest Greene (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. But Really, John |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
36. no one is "whining" about his rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
37. No mention of LEED standards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. STFU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrunkenMaster (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #38 |
86. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
44. I have a legitimate question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Hell no (nt). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. OK. Just wondering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. John Locke was an english philosopher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 05:21 AM Response to Reply #49 |
81. Moderately influential. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
51. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
53. And if a portion of the complex is offices for John and Elizabeth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
60. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
61. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
63. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-27-07 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
64. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
68. That's doesn't change the fact of the 50,000 trees cut or the excessive size of the home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
71. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
72. This is just strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
73. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-28-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
75. Could we get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 03:12 AM Response to Original message |
77. KICK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
78. It's the shut the fuck up thread again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 03:26 AM Response to Original message |
79. KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
80. 3, 2, 1, .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
83. I like the Edwards but this is a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
84. how many electricians does it take to install a bulb at the edward's house...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #84 |
92. It is not uncommon for people doing the building of the house to put in lightbulbs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrunkenMaster (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
85. Yeah! STFU, You Damn Treehuggers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
90. That's offensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. here is a link to real numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-29-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
94. The sad part is, this is none of my business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC