Obama should just say "F-Bipartisanship, I'm moving on with my Liberal Agenda"

[steelmania75]

Seriously, it's no use trying to get a bunch of assholes to agree with you, because they won't listen to you, instead they'll listen to Limbaugh. Obama should just shove legistration down their throats, just like Bush did, but he didn't have strong Republican majorities in the House and Senate and he STILL shoved legistration down the Democrats' throats. Hopefully, he'll stop the bipartisan crap by the end of March, and get down to business.

[leftchick]

1. um hellllloooooo

he does not have a 'liberal agenda'! Perhaps some day he will be forced to, but not this year.

[rocktivity]

2. He will--he's just letting the evidence mount.

He knows his greatest asset is his popularity.

:evilgrin:
rocktivity

[NV Whino]

3. That might work

if he had a liberal agenda.

[Orwellian_Ghost]

4. Describe it

I've never seen this agenda you speak of. Give some details.

[baldguy]

5. Yes, in a perfect world.

Unfortunately the world isn't perfect - and Obama isn't liberal.

[billybob537]

6. Be patient You catch more flies with sugar!

The Republics are doing a great job of destroying themselves.
When your enemy is shooting themselves, don't interfere.
All these lunitic fringe whackjobs are turning the populace off.
Ranting stock traders, Racist's and Billionaire fraudsters are all helping our cause.
All we need to do is be calm and rational, and let them TWEEKOUT all over the TVEE

[ProgressiveProfessor]

7. There are enough BlueDawgs and DLCers that he might lose on some issues

and with that become vulnerable. This is independent of how liberal his agenda is or is not.

[Freddie Stubbs]

8. Not all Democrats in Congress are liberals

He must push an agenda that can be passed by Congress.

[Snotcicles]

9. Yeah, I'm moving on with my Liberal agenda, and you can thank me later. nt