Why do Republics need a national leader?
billybob537
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-09 10:38 AM
Original message |
Why do Republics need a national leader? |
|
They're only a regional party!
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I was going to say because chickens look a lot better running around in circles when they have a head as opposed to when their heads have been cut off.
|
dkofos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Someone has to do the thinking for the masses. |
|
You can lead a repube anywhere but you can't make them think.
|
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The Blind Leading The Blind... |
|
Imagine the ridicule the Democrats would get if they looked to a radio shock jock for their inspiration? The problem is the GOOP has NO leadership...no direction, other than to hang onto its discredited core "beliefs": hatred and selfishness.
The GOOP has no real national leader. Michael Steele? Yeah, I'm sure he'll be invited to speak at next year's CCC "appreciation dinner". Pruneface McConnell? He makes Harry Reid look exciting. John Boner? A combination of a bad game show host and sleezy used cars salesman. Bobby Jindahl? I'll look for him at the same parties Steele's invited to. It's a joke.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.