Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***Official FBI Oversight - Judiciary Committee Thread***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:41 AM
Original message
***Official FBI Oversight - Judiciary Committee Thread***
On C-Span3 now. 9:30am

Leahy starting intro. Disturbed with Patriot Act, re: Attorneys, and bungled NSL letters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Abuses. FBI sat idle, did nothing to stop the abuses
Leahy wants to know what FBI is doing to stop these abuses. Staffing shortages. FBI at crossroads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "Dir. Mueller takes responsibility"
Learning curve has gone on far too long. I hope our oversight will make this possible. Specter up now.

"War against terrorism is deadly serious. 9-11 could have been prevented. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Was he sworn in?
Did anyone notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Here it is! He's being sworn in. Leahy would never let him testify
if he wasn't sworn in.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Specter: Everytime we turn around there is a serious problem
"Lack of confident in FBI, widespread and serious misuse. Oversight inconsistent."

Terrorism reporting: IG says reporting is haphazard. Laptops: missing, ?

FBI provided inaccurate data for warrants.

RE: NSLs, Inspector General found inconsistencies, reckless indifference re: reporting, intentional misconduct (?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Thank you for the link. I don't get the SPAN 3.
:( Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for starting an Official Thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. feed us cube rats!! I hope Leahy gets them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. First rec! First rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Specter going on about...
...FBI agents signing exigent letters where there was no exigent cirucmstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds like Specter isn't happy with the FBI either!
Now reading last weeks report from the Inspector General which cited 3 problems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Isn't it oddthat Specter is talking to Mueller about the Lam resisgnation?
He said the FIB has an affirmative duty to report such matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. yeah, they know something n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Wow....
...does that ever seem to be correct.

He is going on about a political firing of Lam and that the FBI should have come to the chair and ranking member of the Judic committee and should have reported this because the political firings threatened on going investigations of corruption.

No, he does NOT appear to be too happy with them at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's also available here on webcast for The Judiciary Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. Specter: go to an MI5 type situation?
re: Lam, questioning about why she was fired, ongoing investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. Mueller is getting his ass handed to him, slightly burned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. And the questioning has not even started! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Mueller testifying UNDER OATH, just sworn in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Thanks....
...I was wondering if I had missed that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. Mueller, FBI undergoing transformation for 5.5 yrs
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 08:54 AM by 48percenter
(WTF is taking so long??)

Mueller: terrorist plots thwarted, corporate fraud unconvered, etc.

Many successes due to NSLs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Terrorist plots thwarted...
Really now, then what are they still doing in the WH??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. "and a partridge in a pear tree"
that's the only thing Mueller left out of his list of all the thngs that the FBI has accomplished!

What a dick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
25. Mueller says the FBI fell short in notifying congress re: # of NSLs
used, etc. He (Mueller) is taking steps to rectify this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. Mueller going on about the IG did not find...
...any INTENTIONAL bad conduct on the letters, etc. But saying the needed internal controls to make sure that the letters were correctly used. He says he is responsible to make sure it does not happen again. He says he is taking steps to make sure FBI is in compliance with statutes and guidelines. Yada, yada about FBI helping to protect the country against a terrorist attack. FBI taking steps to make things right.

Going into specifics about use of the letters. Cites 911 and why counter terrorism is crucial. Giving examples of what was done to basically help make country safe. Says they did things like enhancing info sharing and ways to communicate. Basically giving the FBI some "atta boys."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
28. Mueller NSLs are essential to fighting terra
NSLs: every counter-terrorism lead must be addressed. (Going through a whole laundry list of what the FBI has done in past 5.5 yrs. to update FBI.) Plots investigated: Brooklyn Bridge, airliners, Synagogues in LA, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Who are the two guys shuffling papers behind him?
They are very distracting. What could those papers be ... his statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. Mueller does not believe the statute in the P.A. should be changed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. these guys are following the bush crime families orders
can't it be any clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
31. Dupe. eom
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:03 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
32. Mueller very clear on that letter statute should not be changed.
Just saying that the way it is dealt with should be handled better.

Says the American people understand how essential Natl Sec Letters are to the War on Terra.

Anyone think we shouls start counting how many times he refers to 9-11 and terrorists, terrorism? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. Mueller very clear on that letter statute should not be changed.
Just saying that the way it is dealt with should be handled better.

Says the American people understand how essential Natl Sec Letters are to the War on Terra.

Anyone think we should start counting how many times he refers to 9-11 and terrorists, terrorism? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
34. Mueller listing now some debunked terra threats and Leahy called him on it by
saying he wants to talk about it in closed session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
35. Leahy cutting off Mueller, too much blah-blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Not blah blah blah..Mueller was talking about terra threats, some of them which
have been debunked as being anywhere near viable. That's why Leahy talked about closed session and the Bklyn Bridge "plot".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
36. Leahy just interrrupted Mueller's statement.
But phone rang and I missed a lot of what Leahy said. Sounded like he wanted him to get back on point ~~ but not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
37. Mueller: with our contractor LOCKHEED, rolling out Sentinel
program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
39. Mueller, backtracking re: NSLs, we value civil liberties
ending his statement now taking questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
40. Mueller now talking about violent crimes and gangs.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:07 AM by Hepburn
And FBI task forces going after this. Says #1 priority is still terrorism, but this is important, too.

Edit for typo in title ~~ sorry!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
41. Leahy, has serious qualms about Mueller's statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. Yep, he sure does.
Going after the disclosure about letters and talking about libraries and other abuses on what the FBI did to look into people.

Using the word abuse a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. "we need the money to support the well run police forces of Iraq"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
43. What? Bush is saying money from COPS program is being taken out
in order to provide funds for 'the well-run police force in Iraq'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. HAA! Leahey said maybe FBI doesn't have enough $$ because the Prez
needs the funds for the upstanding, well run police force in IRAQ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
46. Leahy: Library records under patriot act
causes me problems. re: Windsor CT library, re: computer in library. Gag order on librarians. Abuse of NSL. LEt's check records on this computer, but not tell anyone we've done it. Because you are gagging the librarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
48. Leahy: This is Kafka at the extreme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
49. Leahy, how many times have you issued NSLs to libraries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
50. Leahy asking Mueller...
...how often the FBI abused this in going after info at libraries and ed facilities.

Mueller saying he did not think the FBI ever abused it authority on this and Leahy keeps interrupting on HOW MANY TIMES???? And Mueller said he did not know. Leahy says, can we get that info BEFORE the end of the hearing? Mueller says he thinks so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
51. I'm listening
I don't have any use for any aspect of the "Patriot" Act

and I don't see the need to give the FBI another chance to "abuse" their power

and they will

and I'm not buying into any rationalizations that allow the FBI to "abuse" their power of office...

though the spin is the FBI gave "inaccurate" information in order to secure court approval, the use of the word "inaccurate" is right up there with "mistakes made"

No...the FBI lied...the FBI falsified



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x512688








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. IMO, this provision NEEDS to go.
It's NOT like those records are gonna get up and walk away or be destroyed. It is just purely and simply, IMO, a way for the govt to stick its nose into private matters and spy on us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I want the entire thing gone
and removing provisions is a good start....but the "Patriot" Act needs to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #55
88. Totally agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
52. Leahy: we learn these things through the press, re: FISA
procedures are not being followed. Leahy basically saying WTF is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
53. New computer program to log NSLs coming online end of year
Leahy: was any evidence unlawfully obtained?

Mueller: yes, probable inconsistencies. How could this have happened? Procedures for NSLs, recorded by office of General Counsel. Mueller, I didn't put in a compliance program (what a dumb fuck!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
56. Specter: Does FBI have sufficient funding to protect US from
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:17 AM by 48percenter
another terrorist attack?

Mueller: Items we need and want.

AS: how much do you need $$$?

RM: I will provide that info to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
57. Specter up now.
Asking about funding needed to protect the USA from another terrorist attack. Mueller does not have info ~~ the usual ans of "I will provide."

Next subject: San Diego Union Trib ~~ Jan 13th story re Lam and continued employment crucial to success to investigations. Asking Mueller if her employment was critical to on going investigations.

Mueller denies this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
58. AS: Lam's employment crucial to ongoing success of
operations?

Questioning RM re: Carol Lam.

AS: Had you heard that the FBI chief thought that Lam's employment was critical to these investigations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
59. Specter asking about Lam. Asks Mueller if Lam was needed to continue her prosecution of corruption.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:21 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Mueller says no. Specter follows up with a statement that the FBI chief in San Diego said she was necessary. Mueller said that FBI chief was misquoted......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
60. AS: bringing up Inglesias now
FBI conducts investigations, was Inglesias correct on vote fraud decision?

RM: I don't know facts on that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #60
68. what a bunch of liars, what a cover up by these thuggish criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
61. AS: Bringing up McKay's case now
Mueller: McKay was innovative in the way he brought deparments together, components in database. I am not certain what they are referring to in that article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
62. SD head of FBI said Lam was critical...
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:22 AM by Hepburn
...but Mueller disagrees.

Now Specter on to Iglesias case. Notes Iglesias is a Mexican American. Now speaking about the timing of a criminal prosecution that Iglesias did not bring. Mueller responds that he has not heard anything from FBI field office there.

On to issue of John McKay ~~ FBI concerns about a Seattle case and sharing of information. Mueller says McKay was doing a data base funded by the Navy. To what extent should info be put into data base. The only question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
63. Gee! Is Mueller covering Gonzo's a**? n/t
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:23 AM by napi21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Oops! Spector's NOT impressed with the FBI! I don't believe there are
thousands of facts, and BTW, THAT'S YOUR JOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. Mueller was the US attorney covering up for BushInc on BCCI - he is a longtime fixer
for the BFEE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #71
73. weeds...just a bunch of weeds
but then they never are pulled out by the root are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
64. Specter talking about bad affidavits on warrant letters...
...Mueller, mistakes can be made because 1,000s of facts. Mueller talking about additional steps to be taken.

LOL, Specter says he is NOT impressed. Says that the agents were to be accurate in their statements.

Feinstein up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
66. Feinstein...
...on the SB Trib article on Lam:

Asking about the issue of Lam being crucial. Feinstein followed up on what the FBI head said. And they verified it. And....STATES THAT THEY HAD BEEN WARNED TO SAY NO MORE!

Mueller admits this and says it because they are not to comment on public matters. Spec Agents should not comments on personnel matters in the DOJ.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
67. damn we need a cspan3 tee vee channel
if people would watch some of these, even if only a little bit, it will change the way they see our government work, I no I did when I started watching. Once we get past this no good som bithes in the whitehouse now I will go back to pretty much watching the cspan channels, I find it stimulating

thanks for the heads up :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. I agree. Maybe we should all contact our respective cable co's
aat one time and ask for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
70. Mueller pushing the WH Miers advice explaining the USA firings
being "no comment on personnel decisions". The WH is trying to set up a trap folks. Shutting down the investigative hearings by putting a label of "personnel decisions, no comment".

From a GDP thread I just read: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3183990
EXCLUSIVE: DOJ Official Ignored White House Guidance
The official, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, ignored White House Counsel Harriet Miers and senior lawyers in the Justice Department when he told the committee last month of specific reasons why the administration fired seven U.S. attorneys — and appeared to acknowledge for the first time that politics was behind one dismissal. McNulty's testimony directly conflicted with the approach Miers advised, according to an unreleased internal White House e-mail described to ABC News. According to that e-mail, sources said, Miers said the administration should take the firm position that it would not comment on personnel issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
72. Whew! Thank goodnes for Jeff Sessions
Having him spew gives me an opportunity to go and cook breakfast! Back in five.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. Yeah, I went back to making my goulash!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Actually....
....Sessions is NOT giving Mueller a pass. Kind of surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Mmmmmmm.......goulash.......
And buttered noodles, and sour cream,....where was I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #76
79. it's in the slow cooker, stinking up the house
actually it is a beef based goulash, with paprika and tomato paste. Slightly spicy, very yummy with noodles. Dinner!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. mmmmmmmmm
Great comfort food. I love goulash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. Perfect timing! Cardin up
Mueller has to 'consult' about the number of NSL and how they're reported. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
77. Cardin questioning, re: # of NSLs, why isn't that made public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
81. Kyl: talking about the P.A. statute, "why keep it?"
Relevance standard, explain it please.

RM: 3rd party records become building blocks for further investigation. Compliance coming on board now

JK: re: gag rule, why? RM: Confidentiality request is essential. Talking about how questioning an ISP could tip off the person that he/she was being surveiled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
82. Feingold up now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. R Feingold: without the IG investigation this would have never come to light?
RM: Yes.

RF: I appreciate the FBI is now taking steps to correct this, will you give us progress on ongoing reviews? RM: Yes, we'll see on that.

RF: Warning signs were there.

RF: Do you think that the FBI should be able to get the information on someone 3 steps removed from a terrorist suspect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
83. Feingold is up.
Leahy says after Russ, Hatch is up.

Feingold questioning ~~ about the way that the misuse of the NSL was uncovered. Only because of the IG is what Russ is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
85. Feingold: we all have reason to be concerned about abuse
referring to last weeks' hearings on differences between FBI and NSA. Transparency vs. secrecy flavor of the departments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
86. Hatch up: disagree with my colleagues re: getting rid of P.A. statute
Figures. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
87. Whitehouse is asking the tough question
Should Monica remain in her job if she takes the fifth when requested to testify about her official duties? Good question! Glad he got it on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
89. Grassley up now: asking about transcript from Special Agent Michael German
re: white supremacists and Islamists working together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
90. Schumer asking RM if he had any contact with Kyle Sampson
Mueller took a long time thinking about and answering this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. lol! He doesn't recall! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
92. Mueller is literally squirming in his seat at the moment
over Schumer's questions. He's going to have to "think about" turning over some documents and consult with the DOJ about docs that involve voter fraud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Don't you just love it!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #94
97. The lady behind him has changed her demeanor as well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. Do these dicks just cover for each other or what?
Unbelievable.

What a fucking shell game under Bush 43.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
93. Schumer is asking for information as to that there were was insuffiicient evidence in voter fraud
cases..concerning Englesias and McKay.
Mueller is hem and hawing about making that material available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
95. Schumer: asking if Mueller had any involvement with McKay case
McKay referenced the FBI, McKay's prosecutors worked with FBI. Mueller, let me get back to you on that, Mueller, hemming on that one, I will have to look and see if that is relevent, etc. Mueller, "I would have to think about that, have to consult with DOJ." re: disclosing investigative materials.

Schumer: I don't see why this should be such a big deal. Did FBI back up McKay?

CS: Iglesias, isn't it true that the FBI agreed with David's decision to not proceed with this case?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
96. Now asking about voter fraud cases
Has DOJ or WH asked him? "No." definitively. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
99. Protestor, some Indian woman
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 10:55 AM by 48percenter
evidently she must be on a terrorist watch list. War being waged on American Soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #99
100. This war has to stop!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #100
103. Holy shit!
This is a Patriot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #99
102. Wow....is she ever going off!!!
Usually they silence the feed...but not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #102
109. The war she was referring to was the War on Americans
by the Bush Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #109
111. Yep
"I'm a housewife but I'm as big a terrorist as Osama Bin Laden?" "This war has to stop"

Holy shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
101. wow! What the hell is going on there?
Who is that woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #101
105. Now she's talking about them deporting her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
104. Saying Bush ordered her assassination in 2002?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #104
106. WTF
Cut to the tobacco industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #104
107. Looks like at least one reporter is getting it on tape--oops! cut the feed
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #104
108. Wow! A secret war being waged...assassination? I wonder who she is? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #108
110. She told the woman her name but I didn't catch it and you KNOW
C-SPAN will not replay that part!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #110
113. Where are our cspn TIVO junkies?
Someone has to have this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #113
115. It was C-SPAN 3 not on my cable lineup
or I would have had it tivo'd for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #108
114. She said her name, said she's "just a housewife", mentioned CIA
and said she and her whole family had been accused of being a terrorists like OBL???

Did you catch the reporter standing next to her getting it all on tape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #114
116. she has political GOLD there if she uses it!
and whoever had the camera she kept working to stand in front of as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
112. Session is over, but not without fireworks from a Protestor!
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 10:59 AM by 48percenter
Thanks everyone for contributing! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
117. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC