Make your predictions now: How will PIgboy rebutt Obama's speech tomorrow?

[cherish44]

He'll sarcastically make fun of his charisma and appeal. SOCIALISM...blah...blah...blah...blah...>SOCIALSIM!!!....blah....blah

[K Gardner]

1. Even curioser: How will Mika/Joe elevate Jindal to heights of stardom and diss Obama? Some

curious minds wonder if repugs all over the country will be up ALL NIGHT scrambling for talking points. We'll find out tomorrow.

[Bucky]

2. Since Obama doesn't have Parkinson's, I'm guessing Limbo's gonna go with blackface

Personally, I seriously plan to not find out what Rush thinks.

[Kittycat]

3. $20 bucks says he doesn't mention Jindal.

[SmileyRose]

4. I do not care

He can rage against the dawning the light all he wants. The sun will still rise.

[Lex]

5. Same old tired crap

from Rush and all of the Repukes.

[kentuck]

6. "Folks...talk is cheap.."

"The Chosen One is going to raise your taxes. Do not believe the 'drive-by media'...Obama, Pelosi, and the liberals are going to destroy this country...We have the best healthcare system in the world and these people are going to destroy it...blah...blah...blah..

[hughee99]

7. He'll probably rebut Jindal's speech as well.

It wasn't good, and if this was the guy the repukes picked to follow Obama, Limbaugh will be go off about that too.

[Elwood P Dowd]

8. Socialism, Communism, Protectionism, Isolationism, Terrorism,

the "isms" will dominate.

[The_Casual_Observer]

9. If we are lucky he'll have a stroke & there won't be any more of that.

[SmileyRose]

10. I would not not wish a stroke on anyone.

even if they do deserve some horrid fate..........

[The_Casual_Observer]

12. That isn't anyone.

[SmileyRose]

13. Well

I realize it's a pusbag with lips, but obviously SOMEONE loves it. A viagra was missing.........

[specimenfred1984]

11. How dare you say pigboy, well I never!

Do you have to sound like such a fatty boombalatty hater!

[FrenchieCat]

14. He'll try to say that Prez Obama is waging class warfare.....

But he'll forget to let his listeners know that In the aftermath of the 2008 presidential election, exit polls showed that 52 percent of voters who make $250,000 a year or more voted for Barack Obama.

In a recent article for Slate and Newsweek, Daniel Gross pointed out that in doing so, those affluent voters went against their economic self-interest, since Mr. Obama is likely to raise their taxes.

This is unusual. As Paul Krugman argued in a blog post last year — contrary to popular belief — the wealthy do not always vote against their economic interests. In fact, far from it.

Yet there is a strange paradox. In response to Mr. Krugman’s post, a reader pointed out that when you look at the data on the state level, wealthy states do tend to vote for the Democratic Party, which has the reputation of raising taxes on the wealthy.
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/how-did-rich-people-vote-and-why

[JeffR]

15. Too easy.

With half-truths, quotes taken completely out of context, outright falsehoods and a generous dollop of Heritage Foundation freshly-faxed talking points. I say this as someone who's only ever tuned into Limbaugh twice in my life, but I remain immovably sure of my opinion on this.