Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bobby Jindal Response Panned By Pundits, Republicans And Democrats Alike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 04:31 AM
Original message
Bobby Jindal Response Panned By Pundits, Republicans And Democrats Alike

Gov. Bobby Jindal's task tonight, to rebut President Obama's first address to a joint session of Congress, was a thankless one. But it still constituted an opportunity for the Louisiana Republican to show that he could handle the national spotlight, present himself as a fresh face of the Republican Party, and stand up to the current president oratorically.

On each of these three hurdles, he came up short. Both Democrats and Republicans alike panned Jindal's rebuttal in terms that were decidedly harsh: "amateurish," "laughable" and, most commonly, "a missed opportunity."

"After watching Jindal," one Democratic strategist emailed, "I'd pay a lot of money to be back watching a Palin speech."

"Awkward with capital A," emailed another.

The punditry was equally brutal. Part of the problem was the crux of Jindal's address, which consisted almost entirely of red meat for conservatives. The Governor offered criticism for anything other than tax cuts and ridiculed government spending for items that are either widely supported -- "$8 billion for high-speed rail" -- or seemingly essential -- "$140 million for something called 'volcano monitoring'" (isn't Louisiana Exhibit A in the need for natural disaster warning?).

"You know, I think Bobby Jindal is a very promising politician," said New York Times columnist David Brooks, appearing on PBS, "and I oppose the stimulus because I thought it was poorly drafted. But to come up at this moment in history with a stale "government is the problem," "we can't trust the federal government" -- it's just a disaster for the Republican Party. The country is in a panic right now. They may not like the way the Democrats have passed the stimulus bill, but that idea ... that government is going to have no role, the federal government has no role in this ... it's just a form of nihilism. It's just not where the country is. There's an intra-Republican debate."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/25/bobby-jindal-response-pan_n_169710.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Zero credibility. Zero gravitas. Factually deficient. Anticharismatic.
And this is the only alternative to Limbaugh they can come up with?

I'm thinking that the new party they form when the 'Licans atomize in 2010 or 22012 should be called something like "The Centrist Party." It wouldn't be true, of course, but it would be lots easier to market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Slumdog Republican will not go anywhere after last night...he has crested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I almost started to feel sorry for Jindal
Until I actually listened to what he was saying-- he's a dangerous man. Hopefully, after last night, no one will ever take him seriously again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. just take a trip
to the rightwing organs.

the reaction to obama's speech is mixed, but pretty positive considering it was given by a democrat in relation to a plan (the stimulus) that they are nearly universally against.

the reaction to jindal's in nearly uniformly negative.

iow, when your home audience thinks you sucked, too. you SUCKED.

he sucked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nick at Noon Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who cares what Bobby Jangles thinks ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC