Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen Mark Begich (D. AK) responds to Bobby Jindal 'Volcano Monitoring' Comment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 11:21 PM
Original message
Sen Mark Begich (D. AK) responds to Bobby Jindal 'Volcano Monitoring' Comment
Edited on Wed Feb-25-09 11:24 PM by Blue_In_AK
From Phil Munger at Progressive Alaska
http://progressivealaska.blogspot.com/2009/02/alaska-sen-mark-begich-responds-to-gov.html

In yesterday evening's GOP response to what may have been the most impressive first major speech by a president I've had the pleasure to witness, Louisiana's Governor, uh, blew it. In Alaska, we were perturbed by his suggestion that volcano monitoring is a wasteful activity. We have hundreds of them. 31 are active right now. They sometimes kill people.

Although the unpredictable eruptor, Rep. Don Young, Alaska's most volcanic national legislator, wasn't at President Obama's speech, both GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Democratic Party Sen. Mark Begich (a firedoglake Blue America participant), were in the audience. Young's office claims he was "busy," but some suspect he was still down in Puerto Rico, a destination he shares a fondness for with convicted, imprisoned lobbyist, Jack Abramoff.

Sen. Murkowski hasn't yet criticized Gov. Jindal. Nor, apparently, has Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who somehow was passed over for the job of GOP first responder.

Here's the section of Jindal's address that includes the volcano monitoring section:


But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach. Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the largest government spending bill in history, with a price tag of more than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8 billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a "magnetic levitation" line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something called "volcano monitoring." Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.


Here is Sen. Begich's reply (not yet publicly distributed):



The Honorable Bobby Jindal
Governor of Louisiana
Baton Rouge, LA 70804
Via fax: (225) 342-7099
Dear Governor Jindal:

I write to take issue with your comments on national television last night following
President Obama's speech regarding federal spending on volcano monitoring.
Specifically, you listed "volcano monitoring" in a series of projects you consider
'''wasteful spending."

Volcano monitoring is a matter of life and death in Alaska. The science of volcano
monitoring and the money needed to fund it is incredibly important in our state and could affect the economic well-being of other states and countries because of Alaska's key role in international commerce.

In December 1989, Alaska's Mount Redoubt had a serious eruption that caused a Boeing 747 to lose power in all four engines with hundreds of passengers on board. Fortunately, the aircraft was able to restart and land safely, but damage to the airliner exceeded $80 million. Obviously, had the aircraft not been able to restart its engines, the result would have been catastrophic.

Alaska's largest international airport in Anchorage is one of the world's busiest cargo airports, with more than 600 wide-body cargo jets delivering millions of dollars of goods between Asia, North America and Europe each week. Any interruption of that traffic by a volcanic eruption could be felt in Tokyo, New York or even Baton Rouge.

Currently, the Alaska Volcano Observatory monitors 31 active Alaskan volcanoes and works closely with other federal, state and municipal agencies to ensure public safety and minimize disruptions. Eruptions often spew curtains of ash miles into the air that impact communities hundreds of miles downwind, causing severe health consequences for our citizens. When there is a significant eruption, those with respiratory challenges must stay indoors.

For Alaska and our country, monitoring volcanoes is important business. The more we know about what might happen, the better our citizens and industries can plan for the potential hazard. Feel free to contact my office so we can provide you with further information regarding this important subject.

Sincerely,

Mark Begich
U.S. Senator




I should note here that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's press office was active today. The three soldiers killed in Iraq on Monday were stationed at Alaska's Ft. Wainright. They are not from the same unit in which her older son is currently serving, but it is understandable why she might not be ready today to criticize one of her chief rivals, even in the scarce oxygen at the top of GOP politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. might as well have complained about hurricane forecasting, Mr. Katrina
Edited on Wed Feb-25-09 11:25 PM by jsamuel
It's called disaster mitigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I have four volcanoes in my neighborhood, three of them about forty or fifty
miles away: Spur, Iliamna, Redoubt and Augustine. If SHasta blows, a million people could die. And I don't even want to think about Yellowstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Monitoring requires money and science and only one of those Republicans
love.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a difference an election makes
I don't think this could have happened with crazy Uncle Ted still in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There's a good chance it would have...

...one thing Uncle Ted did NOT tolerate from anybody was going against Alaska, and what was best for Alaska. He would have smacked Bobby down for that remark.

When Bush first started pushing for drilling in ANWR he jumped on the royalty issue, hoping to sell the idea that it would help balance the budget. When it was pointed out that the state gets most of the royalties, bush said they would "renegotiate" the royalty split. Stevens shit all over that idea, very publically, and it went nowhere. I'll always believe that was when bush sicced the DOJ on that corrupt old bastard. Uncle Ted was not one to let so much as a slice of bacon be taken from Alaska's load of pork, and tolerated no criticism of it.

He was no doormat, not even for the leaders of his own party. And that's about the only good thing I can say about the evil old asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You have stated the paradox that is "Uncle Ted" very well.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I guess Uncle Ted learned that the Bush Family La Cosa Nostra plays for keeps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R....great letter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. 5th rec.
Nice to see Begich escorting Jindal to the woodshed. But I have a feeling he won't learn a damn thing no matter how schooled Begich or anyone else tries to make him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ditto - dont' think he's willing to change 1% from this 'creation' of rightwingdom he's evolved into
hope you two are doing well btw.

take care! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank you!
Back atcha.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess his assistant deleted the "you fucking stupid piece of shit' from the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Quite a smackdown
Excellent work from Sen. Begich (and excellent work by the voters of Alaska).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Jindal's response is typical GOP anti-science rhetoric, and should be dismissed as such. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC