Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question about "pork" and the Iraq resolution...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:40 AM
Original message
A question about "pork" and the Iraq resolution...
The repukes keep talking about how the Iraq bill is loaded with pork spending (as if they were opposed to pork spending-riiiight) but can anyone tell me why all the extra spending is in there? I'm not talking about the money for Walter Reed, or for head injuries or veteran's families...I''m talking about the peanut storage/sugar beet kind of pork. I've heard some say it was "leftover" spending from the previous Congress, but I still don't understand why it's in this proposal...can anyone educate me on this or point me to some references? Much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. To persuade the people who did not want to vote for the measures to vote for it.
There are lots of bums who will trade their vote for a "what's in it for ME" element.

Hey, all politics is local.

You tell a legislator to vote to end the war who has, say, the BODY ARMOR factory in his district, that pumps millions into the economy and employs twenty percent of his constituency. He ain't gonna vote to end the war unless a new business gets sited in his district that will ease the hard landing, or even grow the economy. Anything else is suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. There it is.
Certainly the Republicanoid Congresscritters don't have any problem with Pork, they just don't like Democrats getting any. But there was plenty of pork floating out to their districts in the bad old days.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's so obvious, too. It's why I get annoyed at some of these folks who fail to understand the
basics, like that bunch that beat up on Dave Obey, while he was trying to horsetrade with his magic wand for votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. 3.5 Billion for Veterans Health Care
You can find that and what its being spent on at http://www.vawatchdog.org its about half way down Larry's site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. To garner favor for voting for the deadline, mostly...
This is how Washington does it, unfortunately.

While I like the deadline, I find no reason to be happy about or defend all this extra spending. I'm saddened that it didn't take very long for the new majority to forget their spending promises....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Send a email to a staffer here is what they call pork
$4.3 billion to ensure health care for returning troops
$2 billion in port, mass transit and airport security
$6.7 billion to rebuild the Gulf Coast and put people back to work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC