|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:04 PM Original message |
Nurses Fired Over Cell Phone Photos Of Patient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good for the hospital. They deserved to be fired for a blatant violation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. god grief. way to make nurses look stupid!! (and they were stupid to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Good. They are a disgrace to the profession. You might talk or joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Did they pass around the photos? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Not to presume them guilty...but, if they snapped photos, they were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Was the patient ever identified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I imagine taking pictures of a patient's record (which the Xray is a part of) falls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 08:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. Many people don't understand that distinction re: HIPPA. It's not just whether the information is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Well stated. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Posted on facebook... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good riddance. They should have shown some compassion and educated the patient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. "If this really was a sex toy it should be recalled." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. how would you read it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. Hope they lose their certification to work in the field anywhere else too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost in CT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. Not the brightest nurse in the buch is she.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. self deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. I'm glad the idiots were fired. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. As well they should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nobody saw these pics and yet they were fired? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The article implies they admitted taking the photos. That's enuff in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
38. they were taking pictures of confidential medical records (yes an x-ray) so yes, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. We are all in very compromising positions in the hospital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinistrous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. Losing their jobs will not be their only problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. The state board of nursing will be contacting them soon...bye bye, license. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. Reminds me of the vicar with the potato stuck up his bum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'd jail them. They'll just get rehired elsewhere. Have them spend a few nights in the cooler. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. These were photos of an x-ray, not a patient. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Well, your name is on your Xray film. It's part of your medical record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Realityhack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Doesn't matter it's a confidential piece of information not to be exploited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. That's a blatant violation of patient's privacy rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
28. Good. Those nurses were regular pains in the ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
32. If the patient wasn't identifiable in any way- not sure what the problem would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Med records ARE confidential though. And posting a pict of a confidential record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I'm aware of that- on the other hand, I've plenty of diagnostic images on the internet and elsewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. The teaching hospital I work at tried to ban docs from taking pics of patients |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 11:26 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. That was a strange policy, given that smart phone have replaced PDA's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 08:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. The taking of the cellphone photo ALONE was a clear violation of HIPPA. They deserved to get canned, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammythecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
33. Nursing is a profession |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
34. For those defending her, what if it was a regular camera? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
37. Good. I work in a hospital and there are strict rules of confidentiality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
40. I'm sure the patient just slipped and fell on the object. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
41. This sort of bullshit is what makes malpractice insurance so high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-09 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
46. It's a HIPAA - Federal - violation. Disgusting. Plenty of docs and nurses have been fired for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC