Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nurses Fired Over Cell Phone Photos Of Patient

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:04 PM
Original message
Nurses Fired Over Cell Phone Photos Of Patient
http://www.wisn.com/cnn-news/18796315/detail.html

Nurses Fired Over Cell Phone Photos Of Patient
Case Referred To FBI For Possible HIPAA Violations

POSTED: 5:22 pm CST February 25, 2009
UPDATED: 12:05 pm CST February 26, 2009


LAKE GENEVA, Wis. -- Nurses accused of photographing a patient and posting the pictures on the Internet have been fired.

The investigation started with an anonymous call from an employee at Mercy Walworth Medical Center in Lake Geneva, with the allegation that a nurse took pictures of a patient with her cell phone and posted them on her Facebook page.

Last week, the nurse told 12 News she never posted the pictures on the Internet. Investigators have since interviewed the nurse and said she offered more details.

"There were two nurses that independently took a picture each of an X-ray of a patient," Walworth County Undersheriff Kurt Picknell said.

The patient was admitted to the emergency room with an object lodged in his rectum. Police said the nurse explained she and a co-worker snapped photos when they learned it was a sex device. Police said discussion about the incident was posted on her Facebook page, but they haven't found anyone who actually saw the pictures.

The nurse removed her Facebook page from the Internet last week. Without more, Picknell said this conduct does not appear to violate any state laws. He has referred the case to the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for the hospital. They deserved to be fired for a blatant violation
of a patient's privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. god grief. way to make nurses look stupid!! (and they were stupid to
put it mildly).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. They are a disgrace to the profession. You might talk or joke
with coworkers (in a private setting) about various patients, at shift change or whatever--we've all done it, but snapping photos to pass around is just awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Did they pass around the photos?
The article says the investigator couldn't find anyone who actually saw them (other then, I assume, the nurses who took the photos).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not to presume them guilty...but, if they snapped photos, they were
doing it to show other people ("look what's in this guy's rectum! Isn't it hilarious?")--plus, just the act of snapping photos itself is an invasion of privacy, unless the patient consented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Was the patient ever identified?
If not, then was his privacy violated? I'm not condoning what the nurses did but I think the initial accusation against them was off base. They were accused of posting pictures of a patient on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I imagine taking pictures of a patient's record (which the Xray is a part of) falls
under HIPAA or hospital privacy policy. There's no professional reason to take a picture of a patient's xray--none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Agreed.
This wasn't making an xray copy for teaching. We are talking about copying a confidential medical record to laugh at it. And yes... share it with others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Many people don't understand that distinction re: HIPPA. It's not just whether the information is
personally identifiable, it's whether or not you have a justifiable reason for keeping/using/viewing the information. It's an obvious and gross violation for the nurse to take the cell phone picture, whether she shared it or not. Any above-the-board reason she might have had would obviously been done in a professional manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Well stated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Posted on facebook...
Doesn't matter IMO if she has not friends. I think it is clear the intention was to share them. She already saw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good riddance. They should have shown some compassion and educated the patient
on how to 'play safe'. There should be no shame in using sex toys. If this really was a sex toy it should be recalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. "If this really was a sex toy it should be recalled."
Or put a warning label on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. how would you read it?
Oh, BEFORE you use it - I get it

peace

:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hope they lose their certification to work in the field anywhere else too.
They obviously do not qualify as professionals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not the brightest nurse in the buch is she.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. self deleted
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 02:17 PM by KansDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm glad the idiots were fired. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. As well they should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody saw these pics and yet they were fired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. The article implies they admitted taking the photos. That's enuff in my book.
You want hospital employees walking around with photos of your privates on their cell phones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. they were taking pictures of confidential medical records (yes an x-ray) so yes, they
deserved to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. We are all in very compromising positions in the hospital.
If nurses get in the habit of taking pictures of us in embarrassing positions, no one will be safe. I'm glad she was fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Losing their jobs will not be their only problem.
There is a little thing known as HIPAA that could really give them more grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The state board of nursing will be contacting them soon...bye bye, license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Reminds me of the vicar with the potato stuck up his bum
He said he was hanging drapes in the nude and fell and a potato that happened to be on the floor got lodged where the sun don't shine. The nurses didn't have photos, but they did report it to the newspapers.

I've heard urban legends for years. A friend of mine who was a nurse claimed to have treated a patient with a mayonnaise jar stuck there. But this is the first I've heard of photos.

I wonder how it was found out. If they just took photos of the x-rays then the patient wouldn't have been recognized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'd jail them. They'll just get rehired elsewhere. Have them spend a few nights in the cooler. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. These were photos of an x-ray, not a patient.
And I would assume the name of the patient was not revealed. So it's a little different, since it's an unidentifiable x-ray.

Case histories are often published in medical journals showing patient x-rays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Well, your name is on your Xray film. It's part of your medical record.
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 03:13 PM by TwilightGardener
Nurses have no professional reason to take pictures of xrays, and sharing or disseminating or making copies of patient records--when it's not absolutely required for the care of the patient--is verboten. Even leaving a patient's chart open on your nurses' station desk, or leaving your computer screen visible to the public while you're in your patients' rooms, is a violation of HIPAA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. True...
but they probably need the patients permission to use those xrays as they are part of a confidential medical record.
So firing the employees for violating hospital (and potentially HEPA) policy seems reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Doesn't matter it's a confidential piece of information not to be exploited.
I can't believe there are people here who actually are trying to excuse this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. That's a blatant violation of patient's privacy rights
OTOH, I'd not be too shocked to see this film make its way to textbook

Seen that before

In fact, there is a famous one that was used FOR YEARS as an example in EMS classes

I'll leave it at that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good. Those nurses were regular pains in the ass.
:rimshot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. If the patient wasn't identifiable in any way- not sure what the problem would be
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 03:16 PM by depakid
on the other hand- facebook is one of those deals where people just seem to ASK for trouble.

<on edit> speaking simply of the posting of the clinical shot- not of copying a confidential record>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Med records ARE confidential though. And posting a pict of a confidential record
without permission is further illegal. It doesn't matter if identifying info has been removed, med records are confidential legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'm aware of that- on the other hand, I've plenty of diagnostic images on the internet and elsewhere
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 03:28 PM by depakid
not all of which- or perhaps even most of which were there with express consent of the patient.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. The teaching hospital I work at tried to ban docs from taking pics of patients
and whatever condition the patient using their cell phones, etc.. They
had the patients' permission to do so, it was what the pictures were being taken WITH that the hospital had an issue with.

Being a teaching hospital, we see some stuff that you just don't see elsewhere and many of the docs are also professors at the med school. They were using cells phones/blackberries, not the hospital camera like the hospital wanted.
The hospital made the "new policy" and must have gotten an earful from the medical providers cuz a few days later the hospital basically sent out a "never mind" email and said that they would "review" the situation and that any pics taken had to be deleted as soon as the provider was done with them, I guess.
Again, biggest difference here is that those taking the pics had the patients' permission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. That was a strange policy, given that smart phone have replaced PDA's
and are almost always at hand- whereas who know when or if the offical camera might be available.

Patient consent is often a tricky deal. A dead or mentally impaired patient can't give consent, yet some of the images may be very useful.

HIPAA certainly opened up a big can of worms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. The taking of the cellphone photo ALONE was a clear violation of HIPPA. They deserved to get canned,
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. Nursing is a profession
Highly unprofessional (to say the least) behavior like this deserves firing. I don't want to be in hospital and have to be concerned with if, or when, someone is taking pictures of me.

This kind of behavior gives the hospital no other option than termination. They'd be foolish and irresponsible to do anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. For those defending her, what if it was a regular camera?
Do you think it is ok to take pictures of patients or their x-rays or even lab work without their permission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
37. Good. I work in a hospital and there are strict rules of confidentiality
this patient didn't ask for these dimbats to take a picture and they should have been professionals and not done so. They got what they deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. I'm sure the patient just slipped and fell on the object.
It was an accident. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. This sort of bullshit is what makes malpractice insurance so high
The hospital and nurses are undoubtedly going to be sued for this, as they should. How on earth could somebody think that photographing a private medical xray is: a) legal, or b) ethical. I hope the nurses involved never find another job in the health care industry. This is unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. It's a HIPAA - Federal - violation. Disgusting. Plenty of docs and nurses have been fired for
similar actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC