Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Illinois Attorney General: Special election could supercede Roland Burris appointment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:22 PM
Original message
Illinois Attorney General: Special election could supercede Roland Burris appointment
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 08:22 PM by tritsofme
I just saw our Attorney General Lisa Madigan on the local PBS station talking about an opinion she released yesterday.

Apparently her argument relies on a reading of the 17th amendment that casts all gubernatorial appointments as only temporary, and that there is a preference in the Constitution toward direct election of senators.

Here is the relevant section of amendment:
2. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of each State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

She argues that due to the wording of 17th Amendment, any appointment made by a governor is only temporary, and that the legislature retains the right to call for a special election to fill the seat.

Burris asserts that he is the legal Senator from Illinois, and that there is no vacancy to fill.

Interesting times in Illinois politics indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. There would still be the question of how to finance a special
election, right?

I'm all for it, or let Guv Quinn pick a replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The argument about financing the election sounds like feet dragging to me.
Compared to how much this state spends on other crap, I can't imagine an election would finally break the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. ex post facto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This would not be an ex post facto law.
It would simply be the legislature invoking its authority to call for a special election to fill the seat.

So the reasoning goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But the law when Burris was seated
didn't provide for a special election. If they change the law now, it can't apply retroactively, only provide for future appointments.

We'll need a strong candidate to run against Burris in the primary and take him down hard is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They are not seeking to change law. Just interpret it differently.
She reads the 17th to say that a governor's appointment is inherently temporary, and that state legislatures reserve the right to call for a special election at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I bet the courts would rule
that the will of the people (in a special election) trumps the selection by the Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Illinois and Minnesota
certainly have more than their share of uncertainty in the Senatorial Dept this session of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Her father must have someone that paid him a lot to get that seat
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 11:38 PM by RB TexLa
either that or she really is batshit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC