Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't understand. Clinton had higher approval ratings than Reagan. Gore should have won solidly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:10 PM
Original message
I don't understand. Clinton had higher approval ratings than Reagan. Gore should have won solidly
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 09:10 PM by Ardent15
The 2000 presidential election still angers me. How the hell did Bush come close enough to steal it? Clinton had higher approval ratings than Reagan. Gore should have rode Clinton's popularity to the White House.

Was Gore's campaign really that terrible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The corporate media did a terrific job of making the election close enough for * to steal it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. and they painted anybody who questioned the legality of it
(despite the fact that Rush Limbaugh, in October 2000, had said that Bush could take legal steps if he "won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote" ... another video that the MSM decided not to allow ever to be shown again, like Bush saying that he really wasn't that concerned about Osama bin Laden)

as a sore loser, and trying to steal the election ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gore actually entered that election at a huge deficit to Bush.
He was down 15-16 points before the campaign got going. Arguably his campaign did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why was that? Why he was down so much?
Did people just not like Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. He was a running national joke for eight years.
He got smeared as being a geeky hippie who was as boring as Nebraska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Clinto getting his ass impeached didn't help either
yes it was bullshit and yes most people that it was crap, but it still left a sour taste in people's mouth's towards Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:15 PM
Original message
It was a real uphill battle against the media.
Earthtone Al, Love Canal, invented the Internet, sighed in the debate, Boooooooring, Lockbox (I winder if they're still laughing about that one), Buddhist nuns, not really a hunter, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Monica Lewinsky
The damn President was impeached less than two years before. I think that might have played a wee role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And the majority of Americans didn't care about that partisan impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I love Al Gore. I love his environmental policies and his stand on global warming. But...
... he was as stiff as a board and a horrible campaigner. He allowed Rove et al. to concoct endless bullshit about his "lies" and he played into it endlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. "The people who cast the votes decide nothing.
The people who count the votes decide everything."

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Part of it was the sense of desparation on the part of the gop to get Bush in there
no matter what. When the Florida debacle was going on we had James Baker on TV pleading the gop's case. They simply had to get W in to further their plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. BINGO!
President Cheney and the Licans HAD to have the WH in order to rape the treasury, and get their war in the ME, and TAX CUTS for all their buddies who ponied up the cash to make it possible. Cheney had been plotting this for YEARS! The Media Whores wrapped it up for them with a kiss and a big FUCK YOU to the rest of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. The media really fucked Gore over; plus his campaign handlers messed up
trying to make him look casual and "not so wooden" didn't work to his advantage at all. It cost him, because he looked utterly fake.

But the media - frakking hell. They really screwed him over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lordcommander Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why Gore lose NH?
That always struck me why he lost New Hampshire with 4 electoral votes?? Had he won NH in 2000 there would be no *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. because they thought Bush would lower their taxes, and NH residents HATE taxes
New Hampshire is the Libertarian capitol of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lordcommander Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Had Gore Won NH with 4 EVs
Gore-271
Bush-267
I got it from here
http://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/evcalc_sm.php?year=2000
that's without FL and TN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Gore should've won his home state though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. He wasn't "Southern" enough in attitude
Also, Gore the presidential candidate was a lot different from Gore the congressional candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. IIRC Gore's campaign WAY distanced the VP from the P
some quaint little sex scandal that nobody really minded or cared about but caused a conversation stealing diversion nonetheless.

I remember wishing Gore had used the popular president more but they really seemed to not share much stage.

Goddam Brooks Bros riot and the MSM ate it up. Internets were full-on live too! I didn't think the shameless repukes could get away with crap that obvious but when they own the four teevee networks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If he wanted to distance himself from Clinton, he should have moved to the left
Joe Lieberman was a terrible VP pick. He should have picked Wellstone or Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Gore won n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, but it was so close. It shouldn't have been close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Here's a hint
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 09:53 PM by autorank

Your argument is logical and is the type of question lots of people have asked. The answer lies in rejecting
the presumption of accuracy for the official vote count

In 2004, unadjusted exit polls for urban areas were expanded to show more urban votes and those votes showed
a huge increase for bush in 2004 over 2000.

In 2000, unadjusted exit polls from urban areas were contracted to show fewer urban voters, thus reducing the
impact of the huge winning margin for Gore.

There's no real reason to trust the reported vote count in either election.
(http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00165.htm)

Also keep in mind that in many states ballots don't get counted, as many as 2 million in 2000.
http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/electoral_reform/ResidualBallot.pdf

These are consistently ballots in minority precincts, typically Republican ruled. In Florida specifically,
a disproportionate number of ballots were thrown out in precincts that fit this pattern. It was
convincingly demonstrated by the excellent study http://www.hamilton.edu/news/florida/

That's all before any fiddling around with voting machines or tabulation fraud takes place.

Gore probably won by 3-4 million votes but the fix was in.

Here's a good bibliography.
http://electionfraudnews.com/RedPill/Resources/2000Evidence.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. He did win, as a recount after the US Supreme Court crowned King George IV
shown. If they hadn't stopped the recount, Gore would have won after a recount of the State of Florida, which the Florida Supreme Court had ordered. The Supremes were out of their jurisdiction some believe and probably some of those justices should be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. News Flash for ya: Gore won.
They were going to unveil the results of Gore's win in Florida right when 9/11 happened.

Mighty convenient for the GOP-ain't that special-NOT. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Read the whole thread, I know he won, but not by much
It shouldn't have been close enough to steal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Apparently the people just couldn't see what we saw so clearly in bush.
I don't know about you, but I saw a totally worthless jerk. Now, eight years later, the public finally agrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. "Compassionate conservative" my ass
What a sick joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Media, Nader, painted Bush as compassionate conservative and similar.
When painted as capable, likable, people chose diferent, like a new date without risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. What *IS* a compassionate conservative exactly?
I've never been able to get a clear definition on what that is my entire life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. It Is An Asshole That Manages To Cover It's Stink n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Gore DID win!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Gore won. W and his band of assholes still managed to steal it anyways.
That's still trying to happen now. See Franken v. Coleman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. Gore ran a tepid campaign
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 09:42 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
He wasn't as bad as Dukakis (a really lousy campaigner), but he didn't establish a strong identity in the minds of the average uninformed voters.

His "debates" with Bush were pathetic. Most of the time, he appeared to be afraid to contradict Bush. "Yes, I'm for a strong defense, too. Yes, I'm for capital punishment, too. Yes, I'm friendly to business..."

That's why 1/3 of voters were "undecided" just a few days before the election.

Political junkies knew the difference between the two candidates, but to your average American, who wakes up to politics once every four years and who had only a vague notion of Gore and little knowledge of Bush's disastrous history, they looked very similar.

Rule #!: You have to define yourself on your own terms, not as an echo of the other guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Makes sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Supreme Court selected Bush..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. Another factor: the American public got complacent
America was just starting to ride the downward slope of the dot.com bubble, the RW bogeyman of terrorism was a year away, no costly invasions of sovereign nations were sapping our resources, and the government was actually operating in the black. People got careless and apathetic, thinking that it really didn't matter who got elected president - that things would take care of themselves regardless.

Despite the election getting stolen in 2000, enough people had swallowed BushCo's lies to make the election close enough to steal again in 2004. By the end of Chimpolini's second term, however, there's no way in pluperfect hell that the 'pugs could have stolen it again without tipping their hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Lieberman was a real drag
and I think he's half responsible for the loss (Fat Tony bears the other half!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. It's the Clinton scandals that got people to vote for Bush...and a little help from Jeb...
If Bill just would've kept his dick in his pants, we'd be looking good right now.

Deep down you knew that Bush was gonna win Florida in that recount since his brother was the governor. There was no way the GOP was gonna play fair and count those 170,000 ballots that were susposed to be Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
40. Gore was advised not to make appearances with Clinton
Gore received bad advice. Clinton left office with about a 70% approval rating. If Gore would have wrapped his arms around Clinton and never let go he would have won handily. Nader or no Nader. He would have won his own sate for sure if he had done that.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. Gore is a patrician statesman; the great unwashed do not understand
true patriotism and humanitarianism. Al Gore is one of the greatest men of our time. The public chose to listen to the corporate media, which had every intention of getting every little thing that they did in fact get from the shady, phony Texan. Rove and Jim Baker of course, along with the neocons and Jeb Bush, cheated us out of the man who won despite the 80,000+ erroneously disenfranchised Floridians and all the bogus etcs., such as the FELONIOUS FIVE. My one hope is that due to his brother's untold crimes and boondoggles Jeb Bush will never be allowed to hold office again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yes, I mean, the guy picked LIEBERMAN as his VP.
If you're a member of the opposition party and take no strong progressive STANDS, you ain't a'gonna win. People will always choose the Republican over someone who comes off as Republican Lite. Gore moved away from the positive contributions and aspects of the Clinton presidency and instead came off as right of center. Obviously he's not that way now, but the campaign he ran came off as more "at least I'm not Bewsh' and less like 'I'm a leader who will steer this ship right'.

Plus people tend to underestimate the power of a name brand among those who pass the same brain around at dinnertime. Bewsh was a known name despite how much of a schmuck his old man was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
44. Nader told voters that Bush wasn't that bad
since he was the same as Gore.

so people thought they could get Al Gore but with a fresh start after the Clinton administration .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC