Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is NO such thing as Clean Coal!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:10 PM
Original message
There is NO such thing as Clean Coal!
Obama & Congress better not buy into the lie! :argh:


Coen Brothers Direct New "Clean Coal" Ad (VIDEO)

February 26, 2009 11:08 AM

The Reality Campaign has released a new ad. They're the folks behind the widely-played ad that featured a foreman in a hard hat taking viewers on a tour of a non-existent clean coal facility.

In this new ad, a pitchman gives us the hard sell on a "Clean Coal Clean"-scented air freshener that works just as well as "clean coal."

The ad is directed by the Coen brothers, the team that wrote and directed "The Big Lebowski," "Fargo," "The Hudsucker Proxy" and other great films.

Here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/26/coen-brothers-direct-new_n_170196.html

or Here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFJVbdiMgfM


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. And we need to stop wasting "clean energy" money on coal scams.
I like Dick Durbin but the FutureScam he keeps pushing is nothing but a wasted subsidy to the coal industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. You shut down coal fired plants our utility rates will
explode and millions of people will lose their jobs. Real smart move in the middle of the worst recession in the last 70 years. Isn't it bad enough that Obama just submitted a budget that will saddle your grand children with debt beyond belief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nobody is suggesting shutting down current coal plants. Nobody. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh is that right (nobody) I have seen many posts
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 10:40 PM by doc03
on DU suggesting that very thing. It looks like the Op thinks so. I see them all the time just like this one the OP doesn't even state where he or she lives, for all we know he or she has never even seen a lump of coal let alone a coal fired electric plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why would you suggest the OP thinks so?
All I see is an argument against investment in "clean coal" technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Gee, the OP is against clean coal technology
saying there is no such thing as clean coal and it's a waste of money doesn't it kind give you an idea just maybe the OP is against coal period? Am I supposed to think she or he is just fine with the existing coal plants that they don't need cleaned up just leave them be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. There is no such thing as clean coal, and new "clean coal" plants are a waste of money.
That does not mean that existing coal plants should be torn down with nothing to replace them, nor does it mean that existing coal plants should not have to conform to environmental standards. Your argument doesn't really make any sense to me.

It's like if the OP were something like, "SUVs are not environmentally sound; the government shouldn't buy them as basic transport vehicles," and you were to say, "What, so you think the government should CONFISCATE EVERYONE'S SUV? I mean, it's obvious you hate SUVs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. We have a company that is building a coal liquefaction
plant nearby in the next couple years. It will cost several billion to build and they plan on producing something like 60,000 barrels of diesel a day and they plan to inject CO2 into old gas wells in the area. The technology don't exist? Someone seems to think so and is putting a lot of money into it. It will also produce several hundred good paying permanent jobs and lots of coal mining jobs and all the other jobs in supporting industries. We had another company with plans to do the same but they pulled out because energy prices have dropped, they are still building a plant in China though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Jobs are very important
right now but not as important ans the climate. There has to be a way to transition as painlessly as possible.I hope some whizkid invents a doohickey that will give us this transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doc
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 11:18 PM by groundloop
Sorry, but EVERY time in the last 40 or so years there has been any hint of new environmental regulations the big business response has been "It's going to cost jobs." That argument is getting old.

President Obama is right on the money with plans for developing new technology to exploit renewable resources.

And I might add - there is no such thing as clean coal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I have no problem with developing solar,
wind, gas or clean coal, anything to get us off of Middle East oil. I don't see how anyone could be against investing in clean coal technology but still be supporting the use of coal. I have seen countless posts on DU with people wanting to shut down all the coal plants yesterday and for anyone to say (nobody) suggest that is just dishonest. I don't see any comments from the original OP on how they actually stand on the subject, just a hit and run post. Come on the original OP is against any clean coal research (it's a waste of money) yet thinks existing plants are too dirty and does not want to shut down coal plants, give me a break. To top it off a picture of Al Gore, he doesn't believe in any use of fossil fuels period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. I worked on separating sulphur from coal back in the mid 80's
Edited on Sat Feb-28-09 12:13 AM by HughMoran
Does anybody remember acid rain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. The president believes coal from Illinois is clean enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. So clean Nuclear it is.... cause this computer ain't going to electrify itself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC