|
because I am naturally suspicious when liars suddenly tell the truth.
If we were torturing detainees, someday, someway, it will come out. The Bush crew has known that all along. Revealing it in increments could have been a way to cushion the blow or even stop further investigation. Like admitting that, yes, we tortured. And, by the way, here is what torture is. Its waterboarding. And then Fox news drills it into the public's heads that its not THAT bad because, hey, even our own reporters are letting it be done to themselves to see what its like.
It seems that now, when certain people hear references to torture, they automatically assume it means water boarding. And they don't seem to have that much of a problem with it.
I have to admit that I have been listening to entirely too much right wing radio over the last month and, I swear, every time a possible investigation into torture is mentioned, both callers and hosts immediately jump to water boarding. They always conclude that since torture = water boarding and since water boarding isn't bad then torture isn't bad. Its just us liberals who hate Bush so much that we will feign outrage over this harmless little practice and the fact that some terrorists got wet.
I am suspicious that this was a way to control the narrative and to minimize the inevitable public pressure to put Bush/ Cheney/ Rumsfeld on trial.
Then again, this could be a ridiculous conspiracy theory if its as simple as the Iraqis reporting it to the Red Cross.
|