Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President's Transportation Budget Focuses on High-Speed Rail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 08:57 AM
Original message
President's Transportation Budget Focuses on High-Speed Rail
CQ, via MassTransitMag:



President's Transportation Budget Focuses on High-Speed Rail

By Colby Itkowitz and Kathryn A. Wolfe
Congressional Quarterly Today


NATION - President Obama's budget blueprint released Thursday proposes additional $5 billion for high-speed rail grants beyond the $8 billion already appropriated in the massive economic stimulus package.

The Transportation Department's proposed $72.5 billion budget for fiscal 2010 represents a $2 billion increase from the estimated fiscal 2009 total. The department received about $48 billion in the stimulus package (PL 111-5).

Earlier this week, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said developing high-speed trains in America like ones already in use in Europe and Asia is a priority for Obama.

"It's something the president wants for his transportation legacy," LaHood said.

Several corridors linking metropolitan areas such as Washington and New York or Las Vegas and Los Angeles could compete for the rail grants. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.masstransitmag.com/web/online/Top-Transit-News/Presidents-Transportation-Budget-Focuses-on-High-Speed-Rail/3$8061




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. God that's such bullshit.
We're never going to get a high speed rail system with so little money, on the other hand, if you offer a starving man food, he'll take it.

I guess it's better than nothing, but they really aren't serious about this. We need a system like the highways, that level of investment/spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hell, I'd be ecstatic if there was ANY rail service to Vegas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's one enthusiastic vote in favor of state-of-the-art rail being part of
Edited on Sat Feb-28-09 10:53 AM by saltpoint
President Obama's legacy.

Yes, yes, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Run it right down the I-95 right-of-way, in the median where possible, otherwise overhead
That should take care of problems with grade and make the permitting much easier plus serving a proven high traffic area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The plans are to use freight company alignments, and adding parallel tracks
...if necessary. The trains would hit speeds of 85mph or more.

It would not be like the Shinkansen in Japan with a fenced alignment and catenary wires to feed electricity. Btw, a lot of the French rail system "borrows" freight alignments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. A decent passenger rail system would get me off the highway
and out of the airport lickety split.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC