|
"Organized money hates me--and I welcome their hatred!"-- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
That's the kind of president I want. That's the kind of Democrats I want. Tough as nails new New Dealers!
But I think there are two BIG problems that your OP does not address, that profoundly influence the far rightwing slant of our public debate, and what will happen in the future, including whether or not we might "lose" this presidential administration in 2012, and thus our last chance to restore democracy and prosperity in this once fabled "land of opportunity." The two BIG problems are these:
1. Voting machines run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by a handful of far rightwing Bushite corporations, with virtually no audit/recount controls. (--a zero audit--or handcount--in half the voting systems in the country, and a miserably inadequate 1% audit in the rest.)
2. Related to the first problem, and not really fixable until we fix the first problem: Rightwing corpo-fascist control of all news and opinion on our public airwaves, and mega-monopolies of TV/radio and news print.
I think that our biggest peril would play out like this: Deliberately instigated civil disorder, as the Bushwhacks' Financial 9/11 hits home. The corpo/fascist 'news' monopolies write a feasible-sounding narrative about Obama's 'failure' as a president. Diebold & brethren select Hitler II for president in 2012.
There are other perils--for instance, nuclear weapons, biological weapons, private armies created at our expense, billions and billions of dollars stolen from us and stashed beyond our reach (and also likely billions in drugs/weapons trafficking profits), secret operatives within our military and intelligence agencies, and other agencies of government, and in foreign countries, and also massive blackmail dossiers, all in the control of the currently out-of-power Bushwhack principles--Cheney, Rumsfeld and their backers and minions.
This is yet another reason why the Bushwhack principles should be prosecuted and jailed. They are extremely dangerous people.
But the fact of the matter is that Diebold & brethren can easily--EASILY!--steal the next election, and the corpo/fascist 'news' monopolies would go right along with it, as we have seen before. If a Hitler II scenario is under way, they may well use another attack to further it. But the attack isn't what we should be worried about--because there is nothing we can do to prevent it. We should be worried about--and mobilized about--the voting machines, because that's what the 'TRADE SECRET' code is for--to steal elections--and that we can do something about. Power over our voting systems still resides in local/state jurisdictions, where ordinary people have potential influence.
The best thing we can do to help the Obama adminstration is to insure that we can keep him in the White House, with transparent vote counting, when we re-elect him.
The public debate that the corpo/fascist 'news' monopolies permit is difficult to influence. They really don't give a fuck what you or I think. Right now, they've giving...I don't know, wild guess...70% of their opinion coverage to the right and far right. It would be good, yes, for our "Blue Dog" Democrats to shut up, and for the "soft-edgers" to be back-benched in favor of kickass new New Dealers, to argue Obama's program in that narrow 30% closet. We don't have air time to waste. I am all for this. It should be done, yes. But it is not nearly enough to save the Obama administration, if the scenario that I have outlined is in progress, or anything similar to that, involving false narratives and the 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting.
I don't know if it is, for sure. I'm saying the bad guys have this capability. And they have not hesitated to steal elections and totally fuck this country over before.
The media is a secondary problem, and one we can't do much about until we have transparent vote counting again, for Congressional and other elections. In South America, they have terrible media--even worse than ours--and yet they have elected leftist after leftist after leftist. Why? Because they've done a good decade's work or more on transparent, well-run, honest elections. We don't have that kind of time. We have to do it NOW.
|