Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Monica Goodling get to stay on the public dole if she refuses to testify before Congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:15 PM
Original message
Does Monica Goodling get to stay on the public dole if she refuses to testify before Congress?
I am sure she is planning on collecting some kind of retirement check along with benefits now that she has left her government job. If I were to refuse to answer questions from my employer about my current employment and such they would cut off my retirement pay and benefits immediately. How does that work for government workers? Are they allowed to thumb their noses at their employer (the US government) and continue cashing in?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good ?? Don - I'm not sure a felony conviction stops a Congressman from collecting (the Dukester?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I also could collect my retirement pay with a felony conviction
But if I became uncooperative with the Retirement Board they could cut me off. I remember signing papers to that effect when I retired.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I recall only a discussion of initiating a Bill
to address this issue after the "Duke" incarceration....but have not seen it develope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I posted elsewhere ...
I do not believe that any person holding an office of Public Trust should continue to hold that office, or any such office in the future, if they do not willingly and honestly bear witness in the appropriate forum (such as Congress) to the manner in which the Public's Interests were pursued ... or not.

This does not mean I believe they should surrender their rights. Nor does it mean that I believe theor personal lives should fall under the disclosure requirement ... just their job-related activities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. At 33, I doubt she's vested in a pension just yet
It is is sad though that "I'm afraid to tell the truth" is what bush's "Justice" Dept has come down to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. she's on unpaid leave
so she's no receiving anything. and she hasn't been around long enough to be vested in TSA (Thrift Savings, not Transportation Security) so that is irrelevant.

she can't even claim unemployment because her leave was voluntary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you. Your always on top of this stuff
That puts this thread to bed.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC