Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate approves Iraq Pullot!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:56 PM
Original message
Senate approves Iraq Pullot!
Defying a veto threat, the Democratic-controlled Senate narrowly signaled support Tuesday for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from
Iraq by next March.

Republican attempts to scuttle the non-binding timeline failed on a vote of 50-48, largely along party lines. The roll call marked the Senate's most forceful challenge to date of the administration's handling of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops.

Three months after Democrats took power in Congress, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the moment was at hand to "send a message to President Bush that the time has come to find a new way forward in this intractable war."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070327/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Bush vetoes this, HE is the one who's not supporting the troops!
There is no way he can win this. He asked for the money, Congress made the arrangements for it, but like all things, there are performance requirements.

If Bush slams a veto on this, it's the end of the road for him. (I hope.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And if he does sign it, with the appropriate signing statement
saying HELL NO WE WON"T GO.

Then what??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I hope he does try a signing statement on this one.
The reason he got away with the others is that, in general, the American public doesn't pay attention to legislation.

They ARE paying attention to this bit of legislation. If Bush wants to lay his pattern of illegal signing statements out before the public then we should all be VERY happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R there is hope n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Star80 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unbelievable...
Are our reps and senators finally listening to us?

I so want to believe this, and so want it to happen.

Anyone else think we will have a really big MIHOP to make us stay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Make that 3500 troups.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anything in there added to make sure there is congressional approval before he hits Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is great news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. 2 DEMOCRATS VOTED WITH REPUBLICANS
Arkansas ? and Connecticut Liarman

just heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. How did Hagel vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. With the Democrats
One Republican couldn't vote he had an illness in the family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. encouraging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. So the amendment failed, but has the supplemental been voted on? A bit confused..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now that's a headline
If only it were effective immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC