|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
MsKandice01
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:41 PM Original message |
Ummm...this is one HELL of a typo, don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. outsurgents are even worser. I'm series. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. That wacky Corporate Media.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. A what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Hey, you, get back in the Clubhouse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I'm everywhere, baby! :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Anti-war insurgent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. so being anti war now makes you an insurgent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
50. Ned Lamont was an anti-war insurgent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Holy crap!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:57 PM Original message |
fucking amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. From the Coulter news agency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wake.up.america
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. snatch defeat from the jaws of progress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsKandice01
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Keep reading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wake.up.america
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. anti war insurgent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapere aude
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. Snatch defeat from the jaws of progress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsKandice01
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Keep reading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. it's actually supposed to be "snatch defeat from the jaws of VICTORY" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Not even these lying fools can say "victory" with a straight face anymore. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
39. "snatch victory from the jaws of defeat" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapere aude
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. anti war insurgent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. So Democrats are insurgents now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. So Ned Lamont is an anti-war insurgent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. That trickly little Lamont... Imagine. An insurgent in his spare time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. 'Insurgent'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsKandice01
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Actually, it was supposed to say candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. They deserve a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jayctravis
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
51. Possibly a very unfortunate spellcheck gaffe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
20. Anti-war insurgent? WTF? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. An Unlikely Underdog Is Often Referenced as Mounting an "Insurgent" Bid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsKandice01
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Oooh...excuse my ignorance.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. It's a Fairly Common Way of Describing an Underdog in a Political Fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. But Dave....that was before an insurgent was an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. OMG...this is a shocker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. How utterly understanding of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. Context IS everything--and the context is the WAR IN IRAQ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
24. Here's the link. Let the fuckers know what you think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. It's an AP story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicdot
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. found this version by Espo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
25. OH, my lord....shaking my head...wondering what next???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
31. Dam You, Liberal Media! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
32. Snatch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
34. Sounds like the hind lick maneuver. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. LOL! I never heard that expression before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. The mental image is appropriate here I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
41. That's what we need: More anti-war insurgents! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
43. O.M.G. Can it be any more blatant? Totally disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
44. Isn't he supposed to want defeat "snatched"away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
45. WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otherlander
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
47. We're voting for them... here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Tue Mar-27-07 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
49. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Wed Mar-28-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
52. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC