Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Review Editors call for Alberto Gonzales to resign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:53 PM
Original message
National Review Editors call for Alberto Gonzales to resign
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 03:57 PM by LynneSin
It's pretty sad when one of the biggest conservative magazines calls for one of their own to resign!!

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTNjY2U3Yjk0NTRmNTcyNjg1M2EwM2FlNTA0OTYyMzU=
March 28, 2007, 8:15 a.m.

Time to Go

By The Editors


The story of the eight fired U.S. attorneys has been relentlessly overhyped. We do not know that any of them was fired because the administration put its political interests ahead of his or her prosecutorial judgment. Sen. Dick Durbin’s recent insinuation that the attorneys who were not fired had kept their jobs by compromising their prosecutions was outrageous.

If congressional Democrats are wrong to bluster, however, they are within their rights to investigate. They may yet turn up enough evidence to prove that some of the firings were improper violations of political norms.

We do not need more evidence, however, to reach a conclusion about the suitability of Alberto Gonzales for the leadership of the Department of Justice. While we defended him from some of the outlandish charges made during his confirmation hearings, we have never seen evidence that he has a fine legal mind, good judgment, or managerial ability. Nor has his conduct at any stage of this controversy gained our confidence.

His claim not to have been involved in the firings suggests that he was either deceptive or inexcusably detached from the operations of his own department. His deputy, Paul McNulty, insulted the fired prosecutors by claiming that they had been asked to resign for “performance-related issues.” But many of them received good reviews, and none of them said he was told about any disappointment with his performance. If Justice wanted to clear them out to make way for new blood, or to find attorneys who shared their prosecutorial priorities, that would have been perfectly legitimate. By saying what he did, McNulty guaranteed that the fired attorneys would lash out in the press. Gonzales’s latest tactic has been to concede that improper motives may have played a role in the firings, but to blame his underlings for any misconduct and to pledge to get to the bottom of it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. National Review needs MORE COW BELL!!!!
:rofl:

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I love it! The rats are tripping over themselves to jump Dimson's ship!
That beauty in action. We must savor these moments. :-)

Pucker up Unitary Executive - Here comes a sloppy wet kiss from your buds at The National Review.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I prefer to call it the Urinary Executive
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Gonzo has lost the National Review...
He's in serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gonzales - meet Dead Horse.
Can you just GO so we can stop the beating? It's getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. NRO wants this to be "getting to the bottom of it"
Leahy, I believe isn't going to stop if he resigns....he'll only dig deeper. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow. Gonzo's really friendless now
If that rag is even turning on him, it's over.

Buh-bye Gonzo, we'll see you at the hearings. :hi:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. You mean Alboatanchor Gonzales?
:rofl:

Sink Radical RW... Sink...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear me.
And without the smallest admission of criminal wrongdoing. That's skill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Twist is they probably are coming at it from the other direction and really want someone crazier
The opening sentence is a bald lie and the article goes on to read like a Republican talking points bulletin fattened into a fluff article.

They are only throwing him over the side because he is a bad liar and a liability to their agenda for the last 20+ months they have left. They probably also have someone else in mind who is even crazier and more addicted to the Kool-aid.

One thing's for sure. They ain't doing it out of decency or any sense of outrage at his conduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. I do not see "sad" in this picture; this numbskull had no conscience
about torturing people, denying detainees trial, spying on US citizens, or firing attorneys doing their job. Why should anyone feel the least compunction that he will have to go? I just wish he would take Stump with him and Cheney too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC