|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:11 PM Original message |
Gonzales Lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. So can we Scooter him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. If under oath n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Lying to Congress is a crime even if not truly perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. I just listened to Sampson's opening statement again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. And they relied heavily on a Pat Robertson trained flunky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not to worry; WH will spin it that he wasn't under oath at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Dagnabit!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. LOL! Least I know I didn't dream it though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. But he was under oath at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I think they were referencing his statements through the press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Yep. They're doing the warm up on this baby: lying is a virtue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Golly Gosh! He was just "protecting" us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. You'd think that the top attorney in our whole freaking country would feel obliged to tell the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Actually, I'd think the top Atty would not allow an election to be stolen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can't wait for the "I'm a little fuzzy on THAT, I really don't remember" inexcuseable........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. But. . .but that can't be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-29-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. "Lie" The word that disappeared from the America lexicon circa 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC