Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

****** OFFICIAL SAMPSON THREAD NUMBER 12 - GET YOUR PERJURY WHILE IT'S HOT! *******

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:30 PM
Original message
****** OFFICIAL SAMPSON THREAD NUMBER 12 - GET YOUR PERJURY WHILE IT'S HOT! *******
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM by Breeze54
As requested! :P


****** OFFICIAL SAMPSON THREAD NUMBER 11 - GET YOUR PERJURY WHILE IT'S HOT! *******
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=534156&mesg_id=534156
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. "no one was being groomed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. wasn't one of roves toadies amped up about getting one of the spots??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's time for me to
go home.....Damn, it's getting juicy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. how can he not be absolutely certain who was on the list
and taken off, when he can remember that one particular email was in the middle of emails that the committee asked him about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is there so little recollection? Why no real file?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick and thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. thanks so much for keeping these going - I gotta leave in 10 minutes!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Sure! Are you at work?
That sucks if there isn't a computer at home. Bummer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. at home - gotta pick up my son from school and then to the gym
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. No records... ad hoc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. No Files Kept. I call bullshit. You know they had files.....shredder.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Files are on hard drive of GWB43.com
or shredded as you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:38 PM
Original message
What a crock...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
118. sure does. Like anything this administration sez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
69. Yep, 'no files' is a lie, just like 'I don't remember'. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deepthought42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yea!
Surprised we haven't reached level 1. Sigs still working! Course now i'm going to jinx it! :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you!!!
Sampson is everything I had hoped he would be

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. due to the good work of the Dems on the committee
and Spector did ok too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. What's the significance of Wagner being removed from the list?
I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whats the PSN?
reference the USA from Carolina had a good PSN so it was recommended that she wasn't removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. penis sucking nuance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. The thing I just find befuddling, no confounding
...there's so little of a system, so little recollection..

It's a pretty severe indictment of the DOJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Original message
It's all lies... the "I don't remember" defense...
and you know they have files... or had them... they just shredded them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. Is Leahy there, or is Specter standing in? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I think CSpan said Schumer was standing in for Leahy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Schumer standing in. . no Leahy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. I think Schumer's standing in.
I don't know what happened to Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
60. I bet Leahy is doing some serious ass kicking at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. about "mishandled": He claims not to be familiar with McNulty's testimony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. No written records were kept
Schumer voicing his frustration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. They sound like my 5 yr old, when you catch her at something and ask her why she says,,,
I DON"T KNOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. It is the Jesus Camp training these people have received
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Brain damage!
Quoting Bill Cosby. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kyle still uncertain, unable to recall, hazy, not clear, unfamiliar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Does this bitch know anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. excuses excuses ....
if I answered my boss like this at work, I would lose my job

hell ... at this point I have more qualifications to serve my country this little dude ... at least I have a memory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Schumer: DOJ mishandled prep for McNulty's testimony
On Feb 6th.

KS. I did not watch his testimony. I watched parts of it later.

CS: Didn't you realize that his testimony was incomplete?

KS: No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. squirm. "i didn't focus on it" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. "I didn't realize it...I didn't realize it at the time..I didn't focus on it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. When you read second hand accounts
didn't you realize his testimony was wrong?

I just didn't think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. I never intended to mislead McNulty or the committee..
we failed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. "i was busy with other things" argh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. taking the chaney option, huh? lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
140. this is the Scooter defense: "too busy with more important matters." Good meme but not
good enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. When did you know his testimony was incomplete?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. Damn. My stream keeps cutting out. I even went to the Committee's web site and the server
is OVERLOADED and not letting anyone else stream!

This little twit should be indicted just for lack of memory. That's a crime, isn't it? ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Original message
I'm using Stand Alone Real Player to watch
and I haven't lost the stream once on Dial up.

Maybe you need to reboot? Clear the cache? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Original message
I'm using stand alone Real Player and it's suckin' real bad. I'll try a reboot and clear my cache
I'll see what happens. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. "I never intended to mislead..." - I told them to lie -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. When you learned it.. did you try and correct the record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. interesting tidbits on Sampson from Wikipedia
Early career

As a young man, Sampson served a mission for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints among Hmong refugees who had emigrated from Laos to Minnesota.<2> After graduating from Brigham Young University in 1993, where he met his wife, Noelle,<3> Sampson earned a law degree from the University of Chicago Law School in 1996, serving as article editor on the law review.<4> He clerked for Judge Karen J. Williams of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and then joined the Salt Lake City law firm of Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & Loveless.

Government service

From 1999 to 2001 Sampson served as Counsel to Senator Orrin G. Hatch on the Senate Judiciary Committee. After the 2000 election, Sampson "drew on a friendship he had built in law school with Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the vice president, to land a job making personnel decisions in the early days of the Bush administration."<5> Later he worked under Alberto Gonzales as Associate Counsel to the President and as Special Assistant to the President and Associate Director for Presidential Personnel. From there, he served as Special Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, and then, in 2003, became Counselor to the Attorney General. In February 2005 he was promoted to Deputy Chief of Staff and Counselor of the Attorney General.<6> In 2006 Sampson attempted to get himself nominated to the U.S. Attorney position for Utah. "White House and Justice officials backed Mr. Sampson in his bid to replace Mr. Warner, making that clear to the staff of Senator Hatch. But the senator wanted Mr. Bush to nominate Brett Tolman, a one-time Utah federal prosecutor who had spent the previous three years working on antiterrorism issues for the Judiciary Committee staff....Mr. Hatch finally made a personal appeal to Mr. Gonzales to drop his bid to nominate Mr. Sampson. After a four-month delay, President Bush nominated Tolman for the position in June 2006.<7>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
44. Your response was to resign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #44
67. Has Doj asked any candidates for attorneys
party affiliation-don't remember
political leanings-don't remember
support for the president-don't remember in job interviews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. Is the real reason Sampson quit because
he/they did not want him to have access to his "records/papers" for this testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. CS: So you solution was to resign, 3/9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. My mind is so pure and clean such things would never enter into my thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Did anyone at DOJ ask line position applicants
How they voted?
If they were registered Dem or Repub?

He remembers nothing like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
50. Does this turd use GWB43 email?
did anyone ask him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. basically, all these tools not only never remember anything...
they can't comprehend anything, logically deduct anything nor do they keep anything.

I you know if I wanted a house plant for an assistant, it would just easier to go to a garden center for candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. He wrote the talking points upon which Mr. McNulty's testimony
was based on and he wants anyone to believe he did NOT watch his testimony???? ROFLMAO! Anyone who has written a speech, talking points for a speech or testimony would definitely watch the result of their work if they could possibly do so.

Geez, they really do have go beyond hiring people who lie, they really need to test how WELL they lie because, so far, they lie very badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
53. Let me be precise - I don't remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
64. Did this guy say anything substantive today? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. He got tripped up several times in his lies
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:41 PM by Solly Mack
but on the whole...No

Other people did the tripping and Sampson has mainly been well..a one note tune
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
101. LMAO!
Too funnny! What a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
54. Kyle "I don't remember, recall, have no recollection" Sampson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
55. I have finally achieved scandal overload and can't keep things
straight anymore. Who is this guy Sampson and what is he at the hearing for and how does he fit into the US attorney thing?

Nutshell summary with relevant bits of testimony from today would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #55
128. He was Chief of Staff to the AG - Gonzo--
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM by Breeze54
The "keeper of the list of who was to be fired"

He made recommends of who was to be fired.

The Keeper of the List! Sounds like a show tune title! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. I don't remember being aware of that or have any recollection of that is his standard answer. He
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM by buzzard
may as well not be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
57. "Let me be precise. I don't remember being aware of that."
What a maroon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Hello! "Let me be precise - I don't remember." Oh, brother. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
58. (Wow.. someone MUST have asked line applicants these
highly inappropriate questions)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
59. Thank all of you for your hard work!
The cube rats thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. our pleasure!
:hi:

(I consider this public service!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
61. I don't remember ever being aware of anything like that.
(Whether they voted for bush)

Would it be appropriate.

No, blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
62. CS: Has anyone at DOJ asked, support for Prez, voting position
whether they are registered Dems or Cons?

KS: NO.

CS: So you have no recollection of anyone asking these ques.?

KS: Asking those questions would not be appropriate.

CS: Did Miss Goodling ask those questions?

KS: Not that I am aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. A new way of phrasing it: (Sampson): "I don't remember being aware." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
66. DiFi up now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #66
78. bringing up that Lam had indicted some drug cartel
of several murders, etc.

Di-Fi: this drug cartel has been the scourge of the Southern Border. This was a key and critical case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
68. I don't remember, I don't recall, I have no memory
of anything at all.. I swear that song went through my head all day yesterday with Cookie Doan's
testimony and now again today with Karl Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. "my brain was removed"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
70. Sampson the animated house plant. nt
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:41 PM by Javaman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
73. Feinstein up: Lam announced indictment of most vicious
cartel members
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
75. Finally the million dollar question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
76. She is very angry that Lamm's reputation is being smeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
77. I keep expecting Sampson to say,
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:43 PM by AndyA
"I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' no babies, Miss Scarlett!"

Or "Let me be clear: I don't recall about not remembering anything that I don't remember at this time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Lol
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. ...
:rofl:

That was awesomely hilarious! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #77
93. "I never think about things that...I do not think about."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #77
102. LOL!!!!
:rofl: :rofl:

IMHO, Rove let this "animated house plant" testify today, because he knew that his resident "Prissy" would do exactly what he's done today.

Go Sen. Feinstein, don't let up on this fecker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
79. For a Californian, Feinstein does a lousy job of pronoucing Spanish names
That was terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
82. She is going back to the "problem with Carol Lamm" email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
83. Fienstein is debunking the Immigration excuse?!?!?!?!?1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
84. This was a key and critical case that is woth solid gold.
So it's rather hard for me, when no one spoke to her about immigration, for you to tell us that she was fired for immigration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
85. Di-Fi, this was basically bullshit saying that she was let go on lack of immigration
cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. and shes the Senator for California, she would know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
86. HOLY SHIT! She's bringing up the cartel.
Lam DID HER JOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Original message
DiFi say's "You're under oath!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
87. No one told you about (Foggo & Wilkes) investigation??
I don't remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. thumping his hand with each word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. Bullshit.


YOU'RE UNDER OATH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
89. I just heard Schumer over rule someone behind Fienstien speaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
90. She reminds him he's under oath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
91. Feinstein: "You're under oath."
In other words, I know you're lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
94. KS needs to be told to STOP HITTING his DESK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
96. Lam's investigations of Foggo and Wilkes were a good thing
I was referencing Immigration Enforcement.

DF: You never called her and said we have a problem with your Imm. Enforcement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
97. repeating "immigration enforcement deliverables"
What a turd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Original message
Reminds liar boy he's under oath.
Truly means nothing to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
98. Feinstein reminder "you're under oath"
is there a gotcha out there for Sampson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #98
105. Are there statistics which compare each USA office?
I'd like to know how many immigration cases her office had compared to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #105
120. Where is the aggregate information
Mr Aggregator?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
99. If I had a drink for every "I don't remember" I'd be passed out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #99
106. PASSED OUT? Hell you'd be DEAD! Alcohhol Overdose! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #106
117. You beat me to that one!
I would have been dead HOURS ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #99
111. Deceased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
100. and yet you didn't ever pick up the phone
and call her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. He forgot how to speak LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #100
107. After she was KNOWN to be working on a five star case busting an vicious cartel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Original message
Oh, NOW he recalls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
104. Well doesn't HE look believable now... Go Feinstein!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #104
109. Hell, he just contradicted himself. AGAIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. "yes, yes, it's all coming back to me now, funny how that works..."nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #104
116. Oh shit! He's reminding us that he's JUST the aggregator. Awesome!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #104
137. He is the aggreator of the information
but he doesn't remember anything. What are chances of that happening? They should charge him with perjury today. And obstruction of justice. She should ask him if he has an account on gwb43.com


Hobo

Peace

:beer: :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
108. Foggo was #3 at the CIA and YOU DIDN'T HEAR aobut it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
112. DF: No one gave Lam any notice about why they were firing her?
ie: Immigration?

Was any consideration give to the major cases she was investigating?

FOGGO was #3 at CIA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
113. I just heard Schumer over rule someone behind Fienstien speaking again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
114. "All I can tell you is what I know" (and I don't remember)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
115. "information comes in". . but not in any traceable way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #115
123. That's UNSAT! Oh! Aggregator reminder again! No files - Zero Credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
119. A no-nothing little creep.
He's making me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
121. Over 100 replies. A new thread, anyone?
:shrug:

Should this thread be yet ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
122. need new thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
124. With Lam's chubby cheeks and youthfull looks;
he will be a huge hit at your local federal prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
125. We have a decider and now we have an aggregator.
Lovely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
126. I know nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #126
136. Who is the decider?
This is mindblowing. No file, do nothing and of course no memory of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
127. I trust information came in writing.
DiFi asking for the documents. No files? No documents? Fing liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #127
131. But he was "the keeper of the list" ... "the aggregator" Damn, that sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
129. DIFI: and this stuff is not filed? Anywhere?
like someone said. This smells like BULLSHIT.

DF: Who decided? KS: Attorney General decided.

KS: I was the keeper of the list.

DF: The list had no documentation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #129
134. He wrote it on his sleeve and lost it in the wash...yeah that's it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #129
135. i hear Hatch's ugly voice in the background. He's flippin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
130. "Give us the deciders name" - DiFi
good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #130
151. GREAT ONE -"I've heard the voices"
but I kept no records or notes cause I'm the decider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
132. Give us the Deciders name.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
133. I'm confused. Now the Attorney General is The Decider? n/m
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM by AndyA
And the Keeper of the List was Sampson! :rofl:

Who was the Queen of the Court?

The Belle of the Ball?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #133
141. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #133
147. Jeff Gannon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
138. Gonzo is the Decider! Wait until Bush learns that! ;)
Oh, wait.

Sampson "aggregated" the list.

Gonzales, who "wasn't involved in the deliberations", then blindly said, "Okey-doke!"

And nobody said nothin' 'bout no party affiliations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #138
142. uh oh, there's gonna be a showdown....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
139. WHO GAVE "THE AGGREGATOR" THE NAMES, DAMMIT? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #139
150. Specter -- "You'd be well-advised not to answer when you don't have to, or even when you do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
143. Mod? Please lock due to length.
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM by Breeze54
Thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #143
146. new link? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
144. I think Specter is mad
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
145. Was Spector just warning Sampson to not offer anything unless specifically asked?
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #145
149. so now he's sampsons councel??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
148. Does that fucker even know what to aggregate info means?
Because every time he says he did that...but doesn't have a list..but is the list keeper...he just exposes his lying even more

Of course he knows...but sheesh...is he that out of touch with his own mouth ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
152. see thread 13 here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC