Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Earth to Bush: Luring babies to screens is not heroic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:34 AM
Original message
Earth to Bush: Luring babies to screens is not heroic
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 01:36 AM by roody
CCFC to President Bush: Luring Babies to Screens is Not Heroic

 
BOSTON - January 25 - The following is the statement of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood in response to President Bush using his State of the Union address to promote the Baby Einstein video series. During his speech, the President lauded Baby Einstein’s founder, Julie Aigner-Clark, as an example of the “the heroic kindness, courage and self-sacrifice of the American people,” and described the success of Baby Einstein in detail. In 2006, the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood filed a Federal Trade Commission complaint against Baby Einstein for false and deceptive marketing; that complaint is pending.

It is extremely disappointing that the President used his State of the Union address to provide a free infomercial for a company built on false and deceptive marketing. Despite its claims, there is no evidence that watching Baby Einstein videos is educational for babies and toddlers.

The President maintained that Ms. Aigner-Clark “represents the great enterprising spirit of America.” We respectfully disagree. We don’t believe that preying on parents’ concerns about their children’s well-being; deceiving customers about a product’s benefits; or exploiting our youngest and most vulnerable children should have any role in the American marketplace.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0125-05.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. worth a read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R and here's a related thread
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 01:50 AM by JackRiddler
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x30113

Baby Einstein is evil and no surprise that it's also Republican

Videos for 1-2 year olds, under whatever guise ("education") is evil.

Something many people understood when first confronted with Teletubbies, but apparently they fall for the "Einstein" sell.

Excerpt:

CFCC Complaint to FCC

In May, 2006, the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood filed a lawsuit and a complaint to the FCC against the makers of Baby Einstein and similar series geared towards very young children. They cite false advertising by these companies, due to the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that children under two do not watch television <2>, and a study showing that only 6% of parents are aware of the recommendation, <3> <4> yet 49 percent of parents think educational videos like these are very important in the intellectual development of children.

----

Sadly most of the responses in that thread were supportive of the idea that it's okay to train toddlers to watch TV at an age when they otherwise show little interest in it. Hey it's only bright shapes and it's educational and it's "interactive." Several lumped me in with Jerry Falwell and what not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. A hero to * no doubt.
She found an easy way to make a buck. Rates right up there with Superman and the American Way. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I clicked this thinking it was about all the photo-ops he has with unsuspecting babies
who usually cry and cringe when he touches them :)

But I agree.. babies need the sound of their mother's voice, not a blaring TV :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have never seen one of those tapes
They supposedly have classical music on them. But I don't like the passivity of parking them in front of the TV when they are real small.

Being a music freak, I took my kid to the opera to see Hansel and Gretel when she was three. She was fascinated. Then later she saw The Magic Flute, Babes in Toyland, and Porgy & Bess at the opera. All of them were in English and had Surtitles to read along, if you were old enough to read.

Our yuppie neighbors with the W stickers on their SUVs have two little kids. I suggested that they take them to the Opera christmas show of Hansel and Gretel and they blew me off. Muffy said that "Oh yeah, somebody else suggested that too." I guess I should have just told them bluntly, "They won't be upperclass unless they know about culture." Our neighbors think we're a disgrace because we don't have Hispanic yard men manicuring the lawn to within an inch of its life. We do our own yardwork, and it does not look perfect.

When my kid was five, she was fascinated with listening to the original 14th century version of Carmina Burana (not the Carl Orff version) by the New London Consort. Pre-baroque music. I'm not sure why. She was also exposed to the Beatles, Pat Metheny, Rachmaninoff, and various other forms of what I consider good music. She doesn't play any instruments but she at least has a trained ear for good musicians versus incompetent ones. She also loved watching Sesame Street when she was a bit older than toddler age.

She did go thru a Rammstein phase.

Now she likes Matishayu the rapper.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't the crook, Neil Bush, have some business along this line?
I have a faint recollection of Neil Bush getting into a business like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC