|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:40 PM Original message |
I Support Repealing The 22nd Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. me too, ..now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah what could possibly go wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. LULZ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thats my favorite amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. What about the 20 second amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. I've always hated it, but I wouldn't repeal it for one person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Repeals of term limits are usually a symptom of a sick society. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Agreed -- maybe we could limit it to "two consecutive terms" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Laser (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. I don't think so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. term limits are a definite negative for legislators here in US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. No Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
11. Term limits for the WaterCarrier Class in Congress n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the other one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. I wish I could un-recommend this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. somehow, I get the feeling that if we repeal it, we'll end up with President Schwarzenegger for life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. Wow, you really are in a cult aren't you? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
16. No thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. facepalm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. Even if there was an amendment passed, there is zero chance that the wording would allow the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC