|
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 06:47 AM by cali
as presented in GSA meetings- and my take.
Rove plans to target the following states:Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota. In Iowa Harkin is running again. The repukes always want to take him out and they always fail. It's true that his approval within the state isn't that much above 50%, but this is a fools errand. Harkin will be re-elected.
Louisiana: It does seem that this seat is vulnerable. It depends who the pukes run, and what the climate is a year and a half from now.
Montana: Max Baucus has high approval ratings in the state. I don't know who the pukes plan to run against him, but it better be someone who's never said a good word about bush or been within ten yards of him.
Arkansas: Pryor didn't exactly win by a landslide in the last election, and he faced the ethically challenged Hutchinson, but his approval ratings are solidly over 50% and there isn't, to my knowledge, a leading repuke contender.
New Jersey: The repukes always hold out hope for NJ- and those hopes are almost invariably dashed on the rocks of of dislike for the repuke brand in that state. Good luck with this one, kkkarl.
South Dakota: I don't have a clue. Yes, it's considered a vulnerable seat, but I think that if Tim Johnson makes a good recovery, he stands a very good chance of retaining the seat. On the other hand, he may not run due to health reasons. Maybe Stephanie Herseth would run. That would, unfortunately, open up her House seat.
Any input from DUers from these states or more familiar with their politics, would certainly be appreciated.
Coming soon: The seats kkkarl fears losing
|