Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMFG!!!! I can prove the 2004 caging list came from the Republican Party of Florida!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:42 AM
Original message
OMFG!!!! I can prove the 2004 caging list came from the Republican Party of Florida!
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 09:44 AM by originalpckelly

There was meta-data in the caging list excel spreadsheet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Do you fucking know what that means!??!

We can prove it came from them! I just checked the properties of the caging list and it said it was authored by:


Elephants beware of files bearing meta-data. :rofl:

Here is the spreadsheet:
http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/attachments/Caging-1.xls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is quite telling.
Good on you for finding that. Now, send your findings off to someone in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm calling Waxman later today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. let us know what happens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
74. k porter is listed as the author
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is this serious or a joke?
what file is this? where did you get it from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Back in 2004 TIM GRIFFIN fucked up and sent this e-mail...
to a spoof anti-Bush site, because of the similarities in the addresses.

It came from this long list of e-mails sent to the site:
http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/index.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Tim Griffin -- the new AG in Arkansas?
the NON-POLITICAl appointment?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Oh yes, this is the guy they somehow magically had to get into the position...
I bet he was black-mailing them about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
67. More here:
Get yer Tim Griffin "caging FL" e-mails here.


Link to the e-mails at bottom of the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. ermm, we know where it came from
check the archieves, tons of discussion, caging lists are considered part and parcel of the campaign process.

Not to belittle your efforts, but this isn't new. Your efforts are great. :thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. My time if very limited, but I read DU often - I heard of wrong
e-mail dumps, but not this. Did it make it to Greg Palast's book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. it made wiki and it made discussions here (as posted in this thread)
I don't know about Palast's book, but I would venture to guess it did - we thought we had them when this was discovered, but as I said, it is considered part and parcel of the campaign process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. See Palast article from the 28th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. I don't know if it made it into his book, but,
I had read that the georgewbush.org staff who received the dead letters sent the emails on to Palast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. How could no one of seen that?
I can't imagine no one else has bothered to check the Properties of that file until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. People are stupid.
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 09:50 AM by originalpckelly
It may have been checked, but I've never heard anyone point this out.

UPDATE: Google it and I've seen one mentioning of it on a blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. No they are not - it was known
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 09:57 AM by merh
hell, it's even in Wiki for gosh sakes and there were tons of threads on in here.

While the challenge process is prescribed by law, the use of broad, partisan challenges is controversial. For example, in the United States Presidential Election of 2004, the Republican Party employed this process to challenge the validity of tens of thousands of voter registrations in contested states like Florida, Nevada, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The Republican Party argued that the challenges were necessary to combat widespread voter fraud. The Democratic Party countered that the challenges were tantamount to voter suppression, and further argued that the Republican Party had targeted voter registrations on the basis of the race of the voter, in violation of federal law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caging_list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
43. I believe this was dealt with by the Florida ACLU ...if my memory serves me well
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:29 AM by flyarm
i believe this was part and parcel of the AC LU's case against voter suppression in Fla

i could be wrong ..but i remember this being a large part of discussion in FLA..long after the 2000 election.


alot was made of this in fla for 2004..in fact the RNC was supposed to challange many voters..and sending challengers to the polling places.the dems countered it..i know, i was a poll watcher sent to be at the polls for the challanges..for primaries, early vote and the general election...but there were very few challages made by the RNC head hunters...it was all smoke and mirrors..but it did activate the dem party into action to have poll watchers and oversight..and note taking of all that was going on in fla..i believe we were the first state to have such a program...

From a Fla Democratic Delegate...fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. we had the smoking guns in 2004
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:47 AM by merh
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=114640

edited to add, at the time, this was discovered, we didn't know what they did with the lists and the various threads discuss the possibilities.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #45
57. hey Merh you have a better memory than i..i was too busy working in fla to
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:51 AM by flyarm
keep the vote clean..on the ground ...but i do remember at the convention as a delegate for Fla, there were meetings discussing this with many top DNC officials.. ..that i took the info back to my state and county..the DNC was very aware of the caging lists and what the rethugs were doing..and all counties in fla had people working very hard at stopping the voter suppression...as did the Kerry camp...we trained people ..and had people workimg almost every precinct in my county at least but i do believe it was going on in all counties in fla for the 2004 election...

I wasn't on the boards then..i was too busy working the election...but i do know i was one of only two "at large " poll watchers in my county,..we had many poll watchers..and we were well aware that the rethugs were going to try to challange and suppress voters by many means.._including caging lists..


hi Merh!! how are you doing sweetie??


fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:04 AM
Original message
It's not just stupidity.
You would be amazed at things that most people DON'T know about the operation of their computers. Like defragmentation of the hard drive and cleaning of the registry and hard drive. When you start talking about metadata in their documents, their eyes just glaze over and they go semi-catatonic.

Their lack of knowledge is, however, our gain. It is the little technological things, in this affair, that hold great promise for busting this thing wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
37. ok, off-topic question:
I'm going nuts with a recently developed problem on my PC. I run XP. I'm a web developer and keep a lot of windows open. This practice has not been a problem in the past but recently I find that I have to reboot a couple times per day just to work. I seemingly run out of memory, cannot open new windows, stuff hangs horribly.

Defrag is something that I have tried, and it didn't work. What about "cleaning the registry"? How is this best done? Are there other actions that I might do to resolve this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Other more qualified DU'ers can chime in, but I use Registry Mechanic.
Very simple, nice clean software program. I don't like PC Tools' other apps because they interfere with my client software, but this one doesn't. I think the site is http://www.pctools.com (and Reg Mechanic isn't expensive, maybe $30???)

You might need extra memory, too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Thanks SS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. YW
Good luck. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. Not to sound snarky
but you might consider going Mac.

I'm also a web developer, keep 30-40 windows open all the time, and haven't rebooted in 1 - 1/2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. I have a Mac also, but frankly
I could not imagine having to move all of my business activity over to that. Not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Just curious
What do you have on your PC that can't be accomplished better on a Mac? I haven't found anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. I can't answer that
I honestly don't have enough experience with Mac to make an honest evaluation.

But I do know what my priorities are, how busy I am at simply trying to keep up, and the idea of trying to re-learn the skills I have on Windows and replace all the softare - it is simply not on my radar.

I'm simply not going to replace the 3 Windoze boxes I have here, fully populated with applications and historical data, and spend a lot of money and time moving to Mac. I'd really rather spend time away from my desk if I had such time and resources available (which I do not.)

Enjoy your Mac. Mine (12" G4 laptop) is just fine for testing sites, browsing in bed, and serving as a portable Internet radio out in my garden and shop. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Ok, gotcha
Believe me, I don't shake things up -- even updating the OS -- unless I absolutely have to. I always end up spending at least $1K updating applications.

However as an ex-PCer myself, I am going to leave you with the idea that the time you invest in a transition will be more than made up for in lack of downtime and frustration. I have converted many businesses to 100% Mac and not one has gone back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
72. you need to run several, I would run adaware and counterspy, you are infested with
3rd party tracking cookies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #37
76. Have you backed up lately? I just suffered a hard drive crash
and I mean 'suffered'. :(

Since you are a wes developer you're probably more sensible about backups than I was...but just in case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
39. repost pallast's article from the 28th
it's worth it's own thread to go in hand with what you have posted.

http://www.gregpalast.com/bushs-new-us-attorney-a-criminal/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
77. completely off topic:
Why do some people say "of" instead of "have"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. WOW! You must send this to Congress immediately!
And make sure everyone who's anyone on the Dem side gets it!

Bush, meet Nixon. You're walking the same path he walked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. it should be illegal to be a repuke
the repuke party is a criminal enterprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. They've certainly degenerated into an interstate racketeering
organization engaged in fraud and money laundering.

That party desperately needs to clean house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why wasn't the DNC's Office of Voter Integrity work on these issues WHILE they were happening?
That is what the office was set up to do in 2001 - and instead, we got MORE voter suppression and stealing in 2004 than we had in 2000.

WTF was Terry McAuliffe doing for four years? Spening money in DC on DC centric projects instead of working to actually COUNTER the moves of the GOP as he was charged with doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. Yes. THe DLC and many Dems Congresspeople don't give a
damn about voting theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. what's a caging list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. A list of people used to send direct mail that cannot be forwarded...
the piece mail has instructions to send it back to the RNC. If the person who's name is on the caging list doesn't send it back, the Republicans challenge their voting credentials.

However, there are a number of situations wherein someone would still be capable of voting even if they didn't return the mail. The people on that list didn't return the mail and presumably had their registrations challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. This needs some clarification
This is a more accurate description, from Wikipedia:

"With one type of caging, a political party sends registered mail to addresses of registered voters. If the mail is returned as undeliverable - because, for example, the voter refuses to sign for it, the voter isn't present for delivery, or the voter is homeless - the party uses that fact to challenge the registration, arguing that because the voter could not be reached at the address, the registration is fraudulent. It is this use of direct mail caging techniques to target voters which probably resulted in the application of the name to the political tactic."


It has nothing to do with the person receiving it sending it back or not sending it back. It has to do with it being returned as nondeliverable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Thanks Little Wing - I need a "Caging Lists and Why They are
Important for Dummies" cram course. I'm sure this is significant, I just don't know why.

Anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Here's a little background from wiki:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. Thanks for wiki link. Now I understand caging. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Check out these links!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. Isn't this just a contact list for campaign supporters?
I know I had one that looked like that when I volunteered to send letters supporting Dean, and aother one that also included phone numbers when I volunteered to make calls supporting our local Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. No this is a previously talked about thing...
many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. And Im sure the US Attorney who investigates this will get FIRED
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 09:55 AM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. Metadata can be hacked, I think.
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:01 AM by teach1st
Using common tools and taking one minute, I hacked everything but the "CONTENT CREATED" date in the downloaded caging XLS. I'm sure there are ways to hack it all. I know there are ways to erase most of it.




http://www.gcn.com/print/25_4/38253-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Not hard for someone who knows which part of the file to change
Or has time to try several.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. okay but - real dopey puter question coming
Isn't there a timestamp generated with each change? If there is, is this hackable too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #35
62. Just as easily as changing the other info.
Or easier on Windows, just by resetting the clock to the desired time and date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. True.
And heck, you could just register the program to make it look like that.

So what we must do is somehow track down the details and prove or disprove this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. I'm looking through the other e-mails and their files...
and they have metadata as well!

:wow:

All of the time/date stamps seem to check out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. Call Kucinich too; he chairs a new committee with domestic policy oversight.
Also Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. I HAVE JUST CONFIRMED THIS.
I've had this Excel doc on my Hard drive for several years now. I have just checked the file properties as per the OP, and indeed it says "Republican Party of Florida", last saved by kporter.

wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. I found a reference to the original email this was sent around in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Thanks for your efforts but didn't Palast break this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. yes he did
:hi:

DUers cracked this in '04 - Palast made the connection on the 28th with the AG firings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. In fact the reason I'm back to this once again...
is the top story on DU front page about the DOJ's Civil Rights Division being made into a Bushie elections winning machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. repost Palast's article from the 28th
He gives the detail and understanding of what you found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
36. The sad thing about that database is that it has 1800 or so names on it and it represents
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:13 AM by izzybeans
one middle-sized city in one state. There are lists for each metropolitan area of the "battleground states" floating around somewhere. And you know most of them are much larger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
44. Check the Election Reform archieves from 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
46. Great work OPK. A link has been sent to KO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. hello...this is old news!! ..good work op.. but it has been disected by many in Fla
the dem party..and Aclu..of Fla...


fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
53. hang on. double check that. BBC reported that fla caging lists were made by choicepoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
61. The question was who was heir client?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. the state of Florida. hired by the SOS. The Repub party may have created that
particular spreadsheet. So there may be proof that elected officials were also tied to the repub party. But since, in fact, they were the HEADS of the repub party at the time (the SOS's of FLorida and Ohio, also happened to be the chairmen of the repub party), that is already known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Thanks
I thought so, but figured asking was the easiest way to know. Katleen Harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Katherine Harris (SOS Florida) was not Chair of the Florida Republican Party.
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 09:02 PM by SharonAnn
She was, I believe, co-chair of the George W. Bush Presidential Campaign in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
65. I still have some of the caging lists that DUers
captured. The emails were posted on a website for about 3 minutes (georgebush.com or org, can't remember, and they had attachments, which were the caging lists)...are they needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. No, they came up with another website...
and the excel spreadsheet is from there. :hi:

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
66. These people are despicable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCarthy, Sarah (Collins)
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:40 AM
> To: Murphy, Tom (Collins); Vail, Bill (Collins); Card,
> William (Collins); Ford, Jon (Collins); Bosse, Philip (Collins)
> Cc: 'RBumps@georgewbush.org'
> Subject: Pineworks- Auburn
>
> Hello All,
>
> Rod Wilson, owner of Pineworks (a furniture maker) in Auburn
> called us this week. His daughter (who works for him) also contacted
> SMC via e-mail.
>
> They advertise with the Sinclair group and are very
> upset/worried about the boycott being organized against them. They
> won't pull their ads because they say the time slot they're in (during
> the Oprah show) is very successful and they would lose thousands of
> dollars by pulling out.
>
> They have received numerous phone calls threatening the business
> but nothing actionable from what I understand.
>
> I am at a loss as to what I can do for them. Obviously,
> consumers are free to organize boycotts and I'm sure SMC wants to stay
> out of this. However, I feel for the company, which is a small family
> owned business that uses all Maine products in their production.
>
> Any thoughts on what I could do for them?
>
> Thanks,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vail, Bill (Collins)
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:08 AM
> To: McCarthy, Sarah (Collins); Murphy, Tom (Collins); Card, William
> (Collins); Ford, Jon (Collins); Bosse, Philip (Collins)
> Cc: 'RBumps@georgewbush.org'
> Subject: RE: Pineworks- Auburn
>
> I'd suggest an op-ed piece written by a" friend" that exposes the
> injustice of these attacks on a local family owned business.
> The friend could focus on the notion that Kerry supporters are
> apparently willing to damage local businesses and families in their
> effort to stifle free speech.
> Pineworks isn't sponsoring the anti-Kerry piece right? They are simply
> buying ad time on the local channel.
>
>
> Politics is however, a contact sport.



-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Jon (Collins)
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:23 AM
To: Vail, Bill (Collins) ; McCarthy, Sarah (Collins) ; Murphy, Tom (Collins) ; Card, William (Collins) ; Bosse, Philip (Collins)
Cc: RBumps@georgewbush.org
Subject: RE: Pineworks- Auburn

you are some smooooth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. The RNC Senate telling the local RNC to lie about themselves
to the local newspapers!

The way they are talking, it seems they have a guarantee the local paper will print any phony LTTE they receive from the local RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Nasty little lyin' shits.
I can't believe the Congress is taking a long recess.

They need to turn up the heat.

As someone here said recently, "They need to bring their jammies and toothbrush, and plan to stay awhile."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
71. good work, originalpckelly! I wonder what else georgewbush.org will turn up
there has to be something juicy. I am picturing the WH asses sweating it out as more info becomes public. :rofl: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
75. K&R Kudos to you! This is hilarious. What "morans" Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC