Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raising age for smokers from 18 to 21, and require a Dr's prescription to get smokes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:32 PM
Original message
Raising age for smokers from 18 to 21, and require a Dr's prescription to get smokes?
Young smokers getting burned?
Legislators hope to use bill to combat underage smoking; bill would be first of its kind

Oregon is one of 16 states that adopted a statewide smoking ban in restaurants and bars this year, but a bill in the state legislature could make Oregon the first state to raise the minimum age for tobacco possession from 18 to 21.

Rep. Mitch Greenlick (D-Portland) said he sponsored the bill in an attempt to decrease the instances of underage tobacco use.

"I am doing anything I can to stop smoking in the state," he said. "I was addicted at the age of 15 and quickly started smoking three packs a day until I was 26 ... It is so much easier to just never start, and that is why I have made it my mission to ensure that the state of Oregon makes it tougher for young people to get a hold of tobacco."

Greenlick has proposed an amendment for the bill that would make it illegal to acquire tobacco without a doctor's prescription. However, he said the bill is not likely to pass this session and said he sponsored it to get the state thinking about what it can do to be less dependent on tobacco tax money and ensure fewer people start smoking.

"Tobacco is one of the most addictive drugs available and it is legalized, while marijuana is much less addictive and harmful than tobacco and is illegal," Greenlick said. "We spend $100 million a year on state medicaid for people who have smoked, and that money comes from tobacco taxes. The way I see it, if we just get rid of tobacco, we will eradicate the problem of sickness caused by it and save the state money in the end."

http://media.www.dailyemerald.com/media/storage/paper859/news/2009/04/07/News/Young.Smokers.Getting.Burned-3700139.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It won't pass
Too much tax money rollin' in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. And Tobacco company political donations
They're still giving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. If its that tightly regulated they should tax it more like alcohol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Madness. The country is in a mess andf THIS is what they
do with their time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Greenlick is nuts
I'd like to see fewer dumb kids start, but higher taxes are accomplishing that pretty well. They don't have enough money to start until they get jobs and then there are so many other things competing for low pay that cigarettes have a low priority.

Sometimes slowing them down is the best you can do.

I'd hate to see them on prescription. That would only start up a huge, nasty black market that would likely dwarf the black market in other drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tobacco, like grass, guns, or almost anything
is available to whoever wants it whenever they want it. Prohibition doesn't work, any will eventually make criminals of us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. precisely
someday, maybe we'll learn, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tax candy instead. Sugar causes many health problems also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. They will always get them I know I was a teen once...
after smoking from age 14-50 I finally quit. Kids will always find a way around getting smokes I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. We Dems cannot miss an opportunity to be called Nannies of the
Nannie State. We love to control others behavior just as much as
the Righties. It is a matter of which behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. we knew it was coming
Years ago now, 15 or so, I can remember having a convrsation about smoking, and the group having the conversation knew, even then, that this was coming down the pike. I know smoking is bad, and expensive, and all the rest of it, but there is so much more out there more deserving of our energy and time..... sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. How is that going to "decrease the instances of underage tobacco use"?
All it will do is make 20-year-olds underage instead of 17-year-olds. If anything, it would increase the instances of underage tobacco use.

Methinks Rep. Greenlick (D-Nanny State) meant to say "decrease the instances of teenage tobacco use.".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think this will be difficult to regulate.
Will they be able to prosecute out-of-state residents visiting the state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why not? After all, prohibition worked so well.
:sarcasm:

(Disclaimer: I am presently 39 days smoke free)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. How does one get
A prescription for tobacco? LOL! Is this man that stupid to think tobacco has the same medicinal use as Marijuana?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yeah, they're all so concerned about our health
until is comes to a single payer system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. dumb.
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. by all means, lets make this country less free in every possible respect
sorry, i know all the public health and safety arguments. haven't touched a cigarette in 5 years, and never will again. but it someone chooses to gradually wreck their health through the course of their lifetime in order to have an enjoyable crutch/habit to depend on for solace, that's their business.

what's next? liquor? hang gliding? roller skating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. It'll never work
Eighteen year olds already get just about all the beer they could want, how would it be any different with tobacco? Besides, about half of all Oregonians live within an hour of the Washington border, and they'd just drive to Vancouver, WA for their smokes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Common sense isn't that common I guess...
""I am doing anything I can to stop smoking in the state," he said. "I was addicted at the age of 15 and quickly started smoking three packs a day until I was 26 ..."

So legal smoking age was 18 but he BROKE THE LAW and started smoking at 15.

So raising the legal smoking age to 21 is going to prevent people from smoking?

Is the thinking something like this:
I am willing to break the law if it is 18 but not if it is 21?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. You'd better roll voting and joining the military up to 21, too.
Frankly, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to spit the difference, and perhaps make all of these "adult" amusements--smoking, drinking, joining the military AND voting-- legal at age nineteen or twenty.

Next thing you know, the Nanny Staters will want to require a prescription for ice cream, or chocolate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Smugglers can always use a new gig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. what Dr. is going to prescribe cigarettes???
they are supposed to do no harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC