Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I find the FDA to be highly irresponsible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:04 PM
Original message
I find the FDA to be highly irresponsible
to not reveal the dry pet food companies affected by the contamination. It is shielding the company(s) from financial damage, while continuing to risk the lives of many additional animals, and now us.

AND

Blitzer just mentioned that the contaminated wheat gluten may also have been used in food for human consumption.


CNN
FDA finds new chemical in recalled pet food, sick animals

RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Recalled pet foods contained a chemical used to make plastics, but government tests failed to confirm the presence of rat poison, federal officials said Friday.

The Food and Drug Administration said it found melamine in samples of the Menu Foods pet food, as well as in wheat gluten used as an ingredient in the wet-style products.

The FDA was working to rule out the possibility that the contaminated wheat gluten could have made it into any human food, but was not aware of any risk to people.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/30/pet.food.recall.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. BushCo has the foxes minding the hen house all over
this misAdministration. Bunch of criminals

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Since this administration came to power...
I haven't taken any "new" medications. I think drug companies are experimenting on us. When a handful of us dies, they take these new drugs off the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree
I think they pocket all the research money and use us as their guinea pigs.

And don't forget artificial sweetners... and their plans to unleash all the genetically altered foods on us. They are even trying to make it so we won't know which foods are altered!

Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. It seems to be the same deal with all the regulatory agencies.
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 05:34 PM by sfexpat2000
FCC, FDA, FEMA, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Don't blame Bush for this
There was a revolving door in the FDA with all the major food and drug companies throughout the Clinton administration as well. Bushco just modernized the rest of the government along the same model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. HUH??
Anyone who perpetuates the problem IS part of the problem! Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. As with every agency under THIS administration, corporations come before constituents...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of coure they are!
Since forever. ..."not aware of any risk to people" (or other animals)... pretty much says it all.

Another news site >

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/30/national/main2627710.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. When you sift through their rulemaking
here is just one such example:

Guidance For Industry: GMP'S For Medicated Feed Manufacturers Not Required to Register and be Licensed with FDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
CENTER FOR VETERINARY MEDICINE

GMP'S FOR MEDICATED FEED MANUFACTURERS NOT REQUIRED TO REGISTER AND BE LICENSED WITH FDA

This document is intended to help manufacturers of medicated feed, that are not required to register and be licensed with the FDA, comply with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations, 21 CFR 225.120-225.202.

snip

* 225.135 Work and storage areas.

Work areas and equipment used for the production or storage of medicated feeds or components thereof shall not be used for, and shall be physically separated from, work areas and equipment used for the manufacture and storage of fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and other pesticides unless such articles are approved for use in the manufacture of animal feeds.

Comment: Contamination of feed with potentially toxic non-feed substances is to be avoided. Keep all potential contaminants out of feed production areas to preclude accidental contamination of feed. The key element is to prevent contamination.


http://www.fda.gov/cvm/Guidance/1981.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I'm not sure what all that means.
In Texas there have been battles with 'laws' that demand small rancher and farmers tag and register all their stock, including an expensive computerized tracking system, and fines if an animal wanders out of the property, which requires reporting by both the owner of the animal and the owner of the trespassed land! Large 'manufacturers' are expempt. Go figure.

This snip was especially nauseating >
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said it has received complaints from pet owners who claim their animals suffered kidney failure after eating dry pet food.

The FDA is attempting to determine if that company used any of the wheat gluten, imported from China, to make dry pet food, Sundlof said. ... <

Remember China? Where enforcement takes to the streets with bats to kill pet populations?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. The dry food contained trace amounts of melamine
Remember that tacky melamine dinner ware back in the 60s? Everybody had it and used it daily, only pulled out the real dishes when they were putting on a front. I often wonder where that horrible stuff all went. I don't think it ever biodegrades.

Here's the scoop on the toxicity: www.inchem.org/documents/sids/sids/108781.pdf

It's relatively low and seems to be limited to renal stone formation over a long period of exposure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Word from the inside to us vets is that teh suspect wheat gluten
found its way to a dry food manufacturer but DID NOT GET PUT INTO ANY FOOD. They found it in time.

Who the near-victim was is really nobody's business if this is true.

You want someone's name ruined over an ingredient that never made it into final product? Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. What is more important health or someones reputation? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. If the tainted ingredient did NOT get into the dry food at that plant,
there IS no health issue for that company. There IS, however, a legal issue for whoever sold the plant the tainted product, lol. But that's for the lawyers to work out.

FDA needs to know HOW THIS HAPPENED and did anybody violate the law. If FDA released the name of the company who got bad product sent to them, and this harmed their reputation needlessly, FDA would be legally liable for damages and with good reason.

Any lawyers care to weigh in on this aspect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. As a precautionary statement the FDA should alert consumers
of the suspected contaminated shipment and which brands are being potentially affected.

For not doing so, any new incidents will open themselves to lawsuits for allowing the additional damage and lack of oversight.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I think with a lack of evidence of tainted product they would be setting
themselves up for an unwinnable lawsuit.

Libel, IIRC. Or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was just a KMART
myself and another lady were checking the bags of dried food. We saw the words wheat gluten on one of the bags we looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ok here is where wheat gluten in human food is used
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 04:29 PM by rumpel
Wheat gluten - also called seitan (pronounced SAY-tahn), wheat meat, wheat-meat, wheatmeat, gluten meat, or simply gluten - is a foodstuff made from the gluten of wheat. It is made by washing dough made from wheat flour in water until the starch is rinsed away, leaving only the gluten, which can then be cooked and processed in various ways.

Wheat gluten, although not as well known, is an alternative to soy-based meat substitutes such as tofu; some types may taste even more like meat than tofu due to their chewy and/or stringy texture. It is often used in place of meat in Asian, vegetarian, Buddhist, and macrobiotic cuisines.

snip

Western

Since the mid-20th century, wheat gluten (generally known by its macrobiotic name, seitan) has been increasingly adopted by vegetarians in western nations as a realistic meat substitute, particularly by vegetarians who previously ate meat and miss its taste and/or texture.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat_gluten_(food)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I'm into macrobiotics
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 04:40 PM by CountAllVotes
I never liked seitan, therefore I've never eaten much of it. However, wheat gluten is found in many foods, especially "junk" types of foods because it is commonly used as a filler in many types of prepared foods.

While it is true that seitan is a macrobiotic food, it is processed and prepared a very specific way and must be organic. Macrobitiocs as a practice doesn't exactly prescribe seitan, it is one of few options for those that are in a fairly decent state of health.

However, the wheat gluten appearing in pet foods and perhaps human foods is likely being produced at some plant somewhere. Where we don't know.

That is because they will not tell us the name of the company that has been contaminating the pet food chain and causing deaths to occur.

How widespread is this I ask?

No one knows. :argh:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. the FDA & the USDA are hardly more than rubber stamps forBig AG and
all of the associated ills that go along with it, including but not limited to the stealth contamination of our food supply with GMOs, CAFOs that contribute to the creation of super bugs that render anti-biotics impotent before they even hit the market for human use, pollution in our waterways that causes hrmaphroditic fish and other mutations. not to mention the pollution of our air, water and soil with toxic petro chemicals and synthetic fertilizers and pesticides that destroy healthy soil. and you just can't grow healthy food in unhealthy soil.

we have to change the way we eat and what we eat and where we get it from. the upside to that is that we can eat so much better by doing that. true, you'll eat a lot less meat, but the meat you do eat will be much more flavorful and healthy. and the animal won't have led a tortured life to end up on your plate. and you'll know what it ate because you'll know the people that produced it. you'll be able to trust that it's not full of e-coli or mad cow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I find an odd comparison here
its like the FDA is the same as the AKC. They don't do * either! A rubber stamp INDEED and in fact, it could well be a very bad "rubber stamp" to have in the case of the AKC.

How are these two related exactly? I am seeing a pattern ...

:think:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. agree totally
the worst chemical ground contamination can be found at and around golf courses...
which trickles towards the ocean

humankind has to seriously ponder each of our every day actions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. yikes
you got me scared now - I live about 1/2 mile from a golf course! :scared:

Maybe I'm next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC