If it was Rahm who leaked Wiretap on Harmon why.......
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:03 PM
Original message |
If it was Rahm who leaked Wiretap on Harmon why....... |
|
would it be ok for that Dem to crap on another Dem and not any other Dem to do the same?
|
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Maybe she wasn't caving in on something and he is using it against her now? Maybe it's |
|
a way to control and blackmail other members, that if they step out of line, they'll be exposed too?
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. And, what else does Rahm have? |
|
Who else was tapped? What else is waiting in the wings?
And, what was Rahm's reasoning this time?
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Just more hardball with Netanyahu, I suspect. "We can expose just |
|
how far Israel has gone in meddling in US affairs if you don't stop your insane demands."
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. DING DING DING We have a winnah!!!!! |
|
It's something like this, I'll bet.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yep. The timing is just to perfect for it to be otherwise. And I love it |
|
that the threat of exposure is so very public. That's a major "fuck you" from Obama and Rahm, especially when added to Obama being "out of town" when Netanyahu visits soon.
:rofl:
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I had absolutely no use for that phony "Democrat" Harmon even before this |
|
But if this somehow leads to the destruction of AIPAC, and all the tools that do their bidding, then that would be a great thing.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because Rahm was crapping on the RIGHT dem. Those other locked |
|
and since removed threads accused an entirely different dem of doing something that there is NO evidence for.
|
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. oh ok so we will have to wait, just as we did with Jane? |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 12:14 PM by seemslikeadream
or did we wait.........
wait
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. People normally DO wait until there is actual EVIDENCE, don't you know. |
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Around HERE? Really, really?? |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 12:18 PM by seemslikeadream
:rofl:
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Because Rahm is a badass motherfucker that's why. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.