Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RUSH: In Limbaughland, human beings are exclusively male.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:26 AM
Original message
RUSH: In Limbaughland, human beings are exclusively male.
Taking a break from calling Barack Obama every racial slur for a mixed person he can think of, Rush Limbaugh took some time out today to trivialize the sacrifice of American servicewomen, calling them "babes" who were "rounded up and sent to the foxholes" as though women are incapable of making their own decisions, and perhaps in Rush's world, they aren't. In a telling moment, Rush claims that women wouldn't make it in pro football because "the average human being wouldn't last two plays." This telling statement reveals all that is needed: In Limbaughland, human beings are exclusively male. From todays show:

RUSH: The liberals did indeed bandy about, bang on the drums for women in combat. Now anyone with, it just isn’t right. Whether they can do it or not, that’s not what a cultured civilized society does to its women, they just don’t do it. Except in dire, dire circumstances, but yet they did. But yet we’ve not, they have in college, women should be allowed to place kick in college football, but they haven’t said a thing about women playing pro football, now why is that because they know it would be impossible. They know the average human being wouldn’t last more than two plays, the average woman wouldn’t even, it would be, they don’t even suggest it yet they do for the military? So what does it tell you they of the military? Its nothing but a little social playground for experimentation, by the way since they’re liberals they’d love to weaken it and love to tear it apart and cause all kinds of controversy and strife, and they do it under the guise of women’s rights, I’m sure there are some imminently qualified women in the military I am not talking about their ability to do, I am talking about the institution and what it says about a cultured civilized society that it will round up babes send them off to basic training and send them off to the foxholes. It can be done, but its not recommended.

http://halfricanrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/01/limbaugh-denigrates-american.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. OOOH!!! Don't get me started
wonder how long he would have lasted on a ship with Anne Bonny or any number of women in history who saw combat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Anne Bonney?
He wouldn't last two rounds with Keira Knightley...and she only *plays* a pirate in the movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would be willing to bet that there are plenty of women who would
last in a pro football game much longer than Rush would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, he didn't take his Viagra to the DR looking for FEmales!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rush is just an Anal Cyst on radio dial of public consciousness
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 09:43 AM by SpiralHawk
He is saying these things to mask the FACT that he is a chickenhawk republicon paid shill, who chickened out of military service by claiming that pimples on his ass made him eligible for a medical deferment. That's a fact.

So he tries to "compensate" for his cowardly deficiencies by putting other people down.

The republicons, of course, love this, for so many of them are in the same sad category.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. He doesn't understand how the military works. They need a larger pool to get more SMART people.
it's not just warm, fuzzy affirmative action.

Without a draft, there aren't enough smart men to fulfill the military's needs. It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. In his statement, Limbaugh is partly correct in the concept
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 09:50 AM by mmonk
that the average human being wouldn't last two plays in pro football, regardless of gender. The people in pro football are larger and stronger than the average person. However, that's totally irrevelant to military service and can't be made into a truthful statement nor comparison about women in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. half of his rambling isn't even coherent
I realize when people are not reading from a script some sentences may go on forever or not come out right, but do any of his sentences make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rash Limpballs would not survive a day of basic training.
Rush hates U.S. soldiers. He kills them with his words.

Rush hates America. He destroys America with his words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. I would love to see his 3 ex-wives band together to write a book.
I bet they have some unique "perspectives" on the gasbag and his views on women. That's one that would be a page turner. He must really have to shell out the big bucks to buy their silence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'll bet you any one of these woman could kick his anal cyst ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4bucksagallon Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Has he been removed from Armed Forces Radio yet? If not why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's shooting fish in a barrel ...
1. Who are these liberals banging on the drums for women in combat? The only banging groups are women officers who want the combat restriction removed because it's a glass ceiling and the Five Sided Circus which is aware that a volunteer military can't function without including a lot of women. As it is an armed force some will be in combat.

2. Cultured civilized societies treat all of its members well; however, in the one I live in sometime during my life I stand a one in four chance of being physically/sexually abused by a male SO and a one in three chance of being raped. So let's stop the hand wringing about our daughters in harm's way; they already are, uniform or no. At least in combat they can shoot back.

3. The analogy between pro football and military service, even combat, is false. First, what is meant by combat job. It just isn't infantry; it's tank driving, missile launch, fighter aircraft, subs, artillery, etc. All these jobs require great stamina and good health, but not a refrigerator physique. In fact, such a build would restrict a man from fighter jock duty. A female physique would be preferred. Further, just what is combat? Is it a civil riot, a nuclear exchange and where on this spectrum do you draw the line and say no girls beyond this point? Finally, what's the point? Few people can play pro football; that much was stated. Millions have honorably and successfully served in the US military, among them three million women.

4. As for the military being a social playground for experimentation, well yes it ofter is. Pick up the clue phone -- this country is a social experiment. One of its narrative lines has been the ongoing inclusion of groups into the mainstream. The military reflects this inclusion.

5. Finally, 18 years olds aren't babies and members of the armed forces definitely are not. Servicewomen aren't being rounded up. Each and every of us volunteered. None of us hid behind an ass pimple.

PS: The combat restriction applies to 11Bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC