Here's something in sort of the same vein I happened to run across today:
Although the right to 'peaceful possesion' of our own lives is not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights, it is strongly implied in the 4th Amendment. When I do something that offends or insults you, however inadvertent the offense may have been, however necessary to my point I may feel my phrasing was, still, what have I done but commit an 'unreasonable seizure' of one of your most precious possessions... your peace of mind? Without any kind of warrant, I have presumed to invade your emotional privacy and do you psychic trauma. With my thoughtless, heedless, inconsiderate speech or text, I have aggravated you, or angered you, or in some way offended you. Clearly, this is a violation of your basic human rights, and not to be tolerated or countenanced in any way.
When I interrupt the peace and comfort of your chosen life path, I have wronged you. I have, in a very real way, injured you. And I cannot argue that I have freedom of speech, because as I have already irrefutably demonstrated, all other rights and freedoms must necessarily be considered less important than the right of 'peaceful possession' of one's own personal life experience. If my exercise of any of my other rights causes your peace of mind to in any way be lessened or diminished, I am in the wrong. Once you make me aware of my intrusion, my monumental violation of your basic human rights, as a civil, mature human being I must immediately apologize, offer compensation for the damage I have done to your peace of mind, and undertake to never repeat the objectionable behavior again.
More:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/doc_nebula/2009/04/my-profound-epiphany.php?ref=recmuck