Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do Obama’s First 100 Days Mean to Common Afghans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 12:00 PM
Original message
What do Obama’s First 100 Days Mean to Common Afghans?
What do Obama’s First 100 Days Mean to Common Afghans?
By Marc W. Herold


The first 100 days of a new administration in Washington is always a time for comment and speculation about the future. (1) It is an American tradition dating back to Franklin Roosevelt's tenure in 1933 during the Great Depression. But my focus here is upon what has the arrival of the Obama administration meant not within the United States, but rather for the everyday life of common Afghans. Naturally, a qualification need be noted insofar as this is a very short time span and changes might only be revealed in the years to come. On the other hand, some things have changed, as for example in the execution of the Afghan war which increasingly is becoming America’s war. (2) Many commonly used old words and phrases which described things related to the Afghan conflict have been jettisoned by the Obama group in what Jon Stewart aptly called “Operation Redefinition.” The high-visibility Guantanamo prison will gradually be closed to be replaced by Obama’s Guantanamo at Bagram Air Base. (3) Neo-conservative Bill Kristol declares “All Hail Obama.” (4) And under Commander-in-Chief Obama, Americans will now apologize to Afghan families for killing their relatives – a U.S. Special Forces Lt. Col. who killed a father’s three sons in a fire fight, went to the father’s house to apologize, to tug at the old man’s beard and caress his face. (5)

An excellent concise summary of the tactics of Obama’s “new” Afghanistan strategy was provided by Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs columnist of The Financial Times,

Obama’s new Afghanistan … is much as expected: more troops, more training for the Afghan army and police, more reconstruction and more of a focus on terrorism and Pakistan, with less emphasis on democracy-building. The whole exercise suggests that the distinctions between the Bush and the Obama approaches to foreign policy may be less hard-and-fast than we thought. In the caricature version, it was Bush who was obsessed with the “global war on terror”, while Obama pushed idealistic ideas about democracy and human-rights. But here we have Obama ramping up the emphasis on terrorism and downplaying the liberal nation-building. (6)

A couple other pieces of the Obama plan include reconciliation (finding the “moderate” Taliban, or splitting off the”accidental guerrillas” from the committed jihadists (7)) and the usual paeans to improving “Afghan governance.”

The Obama plan’s priority is clearly upon the military dimension and the strategic aim is now identical to that of George W. Bush in 2001 before he converted to “nation-building.” (8) That aim was and is to disrupt Al Qaeda and prevent its return to Afghanistan. But never mind that that has already been accomplished as Al Qaeda has long dispersed to Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, etc.

Obama’s plan is a counterterrorism plan couched in the language of counterinsurgency.

(9)

Table 1. The ‘Democratization of Death’ for Afghan Civilians under President Obama, Jan 20- April 30, 2009


Person’s status Date Killed- Location killed- Killed by
A grandparent- 3 A.M. Jan. 24th- Laghman U.S close air support
Nomads- 4 A.M. Feb 16th- Herat- A U.S air strike
A cook- 3:30 A.M. March 22nd- Kunduz- U.S Special Forces
Mother- 8 P.M. April 17- Helmand- A helicopter attack
Father- P.M. Feb 20th- Logar- U.S ground forces
An un-born fetus- 0:30 AM April 9th- Khost- U.S ground forces
Two farmer- P.M. March 24- Khost- U.S ground forces’ fire
A little girl- March 2009- Helmand- Danish soldiers
A tribal elder- Jan 31st- Paktika- U.S forces’ ground fire
A middle school principle- P.M. Feb 6- Khost- U.S forces’ ground fire
Male motorcyclist- Feb 3rd- Helmand- NATO ground fire
Shop keepers- April 8th- Pakistan- A CIA drone’s missiles
Four sons- 2:30 A.M. March 14th- Logar- U.S. Special Operations troops
A government employee- 0:30 AM April 9th- Khost- U.S ground forces
A driver- 8 P.M. April 17- Helmand- A helicopter attack

Source: Marc W. Herold, The Afghan Victim Memorial Project data base


<snip>

http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2009/04/30/what-do-obamas-first-100-days-mean-to-common-afghans.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kicking for RAWA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. So where are the anti-war orgs?


Just wondering.

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Excellent question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark Twain Girl Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed. Where are they now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC