Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We're All Very Bad People...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:59 PM
Original message
We're All Very Bad People...
:wow:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_05/017992.php


WE'RE ALL VERY BAD PEOPLE.... The National Review's Jay Nordlinger offers some insights on one measurement to evaluate a person's character. (thanks to reader D.D. for the heads-up)

In my experience -- and I'm just generalizing here -- the better the person, the more positive he is about George W. Bush. Certainly the less snarky and narrow. Most of the people I admire most, admire the 43rd president. (Please note that I said "most of the people," not "all of the people.") This is particularly true of those who know something about tyranny, and the need to resist it: e.g., the Dalai Lama.


I was under the false impression that most conservatives had moved away from this kind of Bush cheerleading, and outside of the former president's top aides, the right saw little value in Bush worship. Indeed, I'd assumed the opposite was true -- as the Bush/Cheney presidency became indefensible, the right discovered that Bush wasn't really one of them after all (he spent too much, failed to rein in the size of government, bailed out the financial industry, added bureaucracy, etc.). The idea was to distance themselves from a failed and unpopular president, in order to protect the integrity of the ideology and the party.

Apparently, however, the admiration remains strong in at least some corners.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. you have to love der chimpenfuhrer in order for this nutbar to consider you good?
jay, you are clearly out of your mind. why don't you go put on that special "I love me" jacket and retire to your padded room?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course "admiration remains strong;" the Bushies took steps to close the open society
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, guess what! I'd rather be bad!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am just guessing
that his other definition of "better" involves "making more money than other people". Because many of those people are a) well dressed, b) polite and well mannered, c) give lots of money to charity (because they have lots of disposable income), and d) are always publicly admired by the other members of the establishment.

However, is the Dalai Lama really positive about George Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. And I'm just generalizing here, too, but in my experience it's just the opposite.
Advantage, me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, this is rich. I guess the Let's-Revise-History propaganda push is starting already. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting that they would feel a need to float this bullshit just now. Looks
like a laughable effort to repress any tale-telling about what went on during the Bush years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is he saying the Dalai Lama admires Bush? Because the Dalai Lama
would probably beg to differ, in private. Publically he would just smile if asked, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jay is a silly one,
not to be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC