|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:44 PM Original message |
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) opposes public health ins. "Would be too attractive" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Um, good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:48 PM Original message |
OK, I'll bite: why is it good? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. That it would be attractive? People need insurance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. The thing is, the senator is opposing it. Because it would be too popular. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I think Fuzz thinks the reaction the senator fears is what's good (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
48. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. FFS! They're just coming right out and saying it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
58. Yup, they're coming right out and saying it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #58 |
96. The MSM is'nt reporting it, you would only know it if you frequent progressive blogs/news sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
84. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:38 AM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Single Payer is also the cheapest way to go -- remove age restrictions from Medicare--!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
117. "would hurt the private insurance plans" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. capitalism at its finest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bastard! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. The poor insurance companies would be exploited by the people I ostensibly work for. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. A Democrat yet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
94. He'll be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would hurt the private insurance plans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 08:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
81. It would hurt the campaign contributions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. Pretty interesting that all these people are gloating publicly at us isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I honestly don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Don't complicate it. It is exactly as you hear it. A put-down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. I agree, but why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. I think that they all know that it's not the public that elects them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Yes. It makes sense. He has to GO! He is showing who he is really supporting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #29 |
86. sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one: He's bought and paid for by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
57. You get it ..they do not. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
63. It isn't complicated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
91. Aren't they thinking that they want to get relelected and campaign $ is what does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. DU rules prohibit expression of my thoughts about Mr Nelson. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. But they don't prohibit your advocating for another Democrat to challenge him for his seat! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. Under the current system it is almost impossible to unseat an incumbent Democrat in a primary. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
107. It might not be that impossible in Nebraska. John Kleeb enjoys high name recognition here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:36 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. I hope he has a source of lots of money. He will need it. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nxylas
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Would they prohibit expression of your thoughts about a completely fictional senator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Deleted message |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
59. Yes but he does got inserted into the DU mass mind.. conservadem. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. The people really want this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
60. It's going to be a real test ..pass the popcorn as they say nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. Isn't competition a good thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. When's he up for re-election (assuming he plans to run) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazylikafox
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Any real dem opposing him gets my money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharlo
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
20. I think B. Nelson should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
checks-n-balances
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. Great idea - that DINO needs to put his money where his mouth is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #38 |
108. The kind who have only had the choice between a bad Democrat and NO Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiranon
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
111. Absolutely. Until he turns down all government paid for health care for himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. $608,000 from the Insurance industry - $233,000 from Health Care professionals in bribes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
23. (facepalm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:07 AM Response to Reply #23 |
72. Wanting him to support what is good? What kind of ideological purist maniac are you!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. Ben Nelson can always be counted on to be a one-man band of "no." He's useless. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. An unabashedly fucked up statement. Shameless and infuriating. Is he up for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I don't see him getting "kicked to the curb". He is an incumbent. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Well, that sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. You have such a way with words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
27. Does anyone here think there is a snowball in hell chance for a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. There's precedent for successful net-roots primary challengers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I think that moveon might have a chance. They (we) need to start picking off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Could be I'm thinking of Dems challenging GOP incumbents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. I would love to mount some primary challenges but it is an up hill battle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
31. So Ben Nelson represents the insurance companies and not the citizens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
34. Good Pro Business Democratic Conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
37. It amazes me that so many are wiling to baldly admit that the "public option" is so much better ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Hear, hear! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimWis
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
41. The majority of people want public health insurance, I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
42. Is he going to set an example and give up his? Imagine trying to buy health ins. as an individual!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
43. Insurance companies OWN Nebraska. Check out this website: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
47. Fuck him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
49. campaign finance reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
50. But public health systems cut costs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. I wonder if Nelson, the insurance companies and other that opposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
52. aaaaarrgh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBoy
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
53. What a total dick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
handmade34
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
54. unfortunate that many of our Democratic representative and senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
55. Of course it would be because it would be cheaper. KNR nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
56. IOW, fuck the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
61. "We have to elect better Democrats" - Cindy Sheehan nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
62. Get rid of this guy. He represents the ins. industry, not the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
64. yeah, more attractive than the shit plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikekohr
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
65. Nelson Raked in Over $600,000.00 from the Insurance Industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hangman86
![]() |
Sat May-02-09 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
66. Why give insurance companies incentive to be less greedy and merciless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
67. fuck private insurance--they are leaches on our society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
68. We should put Nelson's reelection funding up on EBay. I'm sure we could raise more than $600k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dgibby
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 08:41 AM Response to Reply #68 |
82. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
69. It would be too attracting because private insurance SUCKS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
70. That's the point, Poindexter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vssmith
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
71. Is Omaha, in his state, the center for many Insurance companies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:27 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Yes...between here and Hartford CT, insurance rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
73. As a Nebraskan D, who worked to reseat the Senator... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joey Liberal
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
75. He doesnt want us to have the coverage he enjoys nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
76. There are dozens of insurance companies based |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrZeeLit
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
77. Rachel Maddow had Nelson on her show one night. Did you see the look on her face? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
78. He basically said that public health care is too damn good for you unwashed masses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Gunslinger
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
79. we wouldn't want to hurt our corporate donors...........errrr private insurance companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
80. Dumbass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
83. says Nelson, "what you don't understand is I don't give a FUCK about you *people*" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mn9driver
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
85. We don't need Nelson to vote for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
88. Puts him at odds with 2/3 of Americans...so what. He represents but one state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #88 |
110. I would like to see the national party fund that poll, and an ad campaign and put pressure on him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
89. Any "reform" that LACKS a public option is a huge step BACKWARDS - & WORSE than doing NOTHING at... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
floridablue
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
90. Dino Nelson has always been on the opposite side of Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ed76638
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
92. Fascism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
93. May I suggest that anyone who disagrees with Nelson . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
95. What organization is working to replace Ben Nelson?? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
97. Of course he's against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam_laddie
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
98. Excellent point made on "Washigton Journal" this morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
99. pig.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
100. devils advocate question: What do you propose happen to the millions who work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #100 |
102. You do what the rest of us suckers have had to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
101. I hope it puts private, for-profit insurance completely out of business, eventually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
103. If SiNGLE PAYER GOVERNMENT PROVIDED HEALTH CARE brought about the END of the PRIVATE INSURANCE PLANS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lakercub
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
105. I think I may ask my wife to stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
106. Just like his job. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
109. Seriously, how could any Democrat vote for this guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:30 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. It's been a matter of utter and total lack of even remotely acceptable alternatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
112. How does this cocksucker republican Nelson call himself a democrat - he always favors corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
113. This Senator owns responsibility for more annual American deaths than 911. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sun May-03-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
115. And that's the fucking point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC