|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:46 PM Original message |
Teens acquitted of murder, aggravated assault, ethnic intimidation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Three words: All white jury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. The whole area is white ......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Just like with black folks in the south back in the day, the feds will *have* to intervene... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I hope so ........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PADemD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Why didn't they move the trial to another county? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Because the defense lawyers were smart, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Two Words: Jury Nullification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. No, sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. Didn't the thugs admit to the beating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The defense was they didn't kill him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. That wasn't the defense .............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The Mexicans who live there will find that they aren't alone in their outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. The defense was that the boy who got immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. No, that's not what the defense was ........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. In most cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. That's not so ............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renegade000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #38 |
69. That's interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:50 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. You sound like a first-year criminal law exam question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Your construct would apply to a different kind of charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Hell yeah we do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburnblu (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. Must be guilty on some counts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. The prosecution did a lousy job ............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. I knew this was going to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. This verdict will not stand. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. What do you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. How will it not stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I'm not a lawyer but I can tell you, the community will not walk away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. It looks like the local community will just let it go, there does not seem to be any serious outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. No, that's not true ............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Your expectations are much higher than mine...then again I am old and somewhat cynical about such |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. A few things - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:30 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I set a tickler to check back in 90 days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 02:43 AM Response to Reply #43 |
52. And you are basing that on what? No one reported Jenna either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
61. I base that on the nature of the area and long observations of American culture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 06:23 AM Response to Reply #16 |
53. They could still be charged at the federal level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtowngman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. Travesty indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. She wasn't his wife ............... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
67. Crystal wasn't his wife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NOW tense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. "baited the Ramirez into a fight with racial epithets" ???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. That article is really sloppy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
59. the comments at the end of this article really say it all . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. It's not a travesty. It's just Phase One. Wait for the federal charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jkid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. What would the charges be so that double jeopardy is not invoked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Violation of the dead man's civil rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:42 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. IIRC that means a documented conspiracy. That will not be easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I don't think it's impossible, though, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Can't get blood from a stone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. The Goldmans managed to get blood from the OJ stone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. But OJ had resources, the perps do not. Pretty much judgement proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 06:37 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. They don't have resources now--but they're young. They have a lifetime of earning to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. I've Been To Shenandoah A Few Times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Oh, you bet we were ............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sazemisery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. like they say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. Damned shame that these little racist fucks got away with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Strange ................ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
26. This is why we need hate crimes legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
62. As I understand it, hate crimes were charged but turned down by the jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
28. I bet these shits are proud of themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. I remember reading about it when it first happened and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. No, they're not ........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. I wrote a letter to Eric Holder about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. The Feds have already intervened .......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
47of74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I hope the Feds clean house down there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
42. All white jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
46. Anyone surprised? Anyone?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
54. This sick shit made me think of other recent Pennsylvania douchebaggery: Jailing Kids for Cash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
55. Pennsylvania: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
56. this must be what Sarah Palin considered the "real pro american" areas of the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drchoice22 (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
58. I don't even know why we have a law system or a jury.. Everyone here already knows who is guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Gunslinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. It doesn't take a rocket scientist.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. You scenario is flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC