Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Modern, fashionable women mix and match expensive pieces with cheaper items.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:37 PM
Original message
Modern, fashionable women mix and match expensive pieces with cheaper items.
Its not hypocrisy.
Its been going on for quite some time.
Mixing second hand clothes from a thrift store with a pair of expensive shoes.
Mixing a Target dress with a Marc Jacobs bag.
Mixing a vintage Chanel blazer with a pair of Chuck Taylors.
Decorating an inexpensive sweater with cheap, costume jewelry broaches as Michelle Obama does so often.

This is the way a lot of women dress today.
They are a little more conscientious about their purchases, so they don't just rush out and spend big bucks on every item.
They buy a few expensive accessories that are versatile and of high enough quality to last for years.

Michelle Obama dares to wear cheaper clothes than other wealthy women.
That doesn't mean she can NEVER wear a single luxury item.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fact that this is even an issue on a Dem board blows my mind.
Who knows if those sneakers were bought or given to her? Who should care?

Don't we have more important things to worry about and critique?

And imo, I like the mixing and matching. Makes a person much more interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think people are more critical of women in general when it comes to how they look.
This is an extention of that, and the shallowness is not just limited to Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. That's true. I cannot remember reading about someone male
chastised for spending hundreds- or more! on a suit, for instance. But put on a $400 pair of shoes (with your less expensive outfit) and you're targeted.

Powerful men are expected to dress well. Why should the First Lady be castigated because she's actually got enough of a personal sense of style to mix and match, as you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Women often spend what money they have on comfortable shoes and nice purses.
I'm one of them. I have bad feet from years of running so I generally buy shoes with leather soles. I have a couple of Louis Vuitton bags that I've had for years. I shop in Target, consigment stores, Marshall's and TJ Maxx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's nice, EmilyAnne.
You do know that women have been doing that for - well - a couple of centuries, right? Victorian women were particularly adept at mixing and matching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So....your point...??? I should give credit to Victorian women? Conjure their spirits to exonerate
Michelle Obama from the petty bullshit I see posted against her?

Thank you, Victorian women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Um, no.
Simply that you seem to feel that it's a relatively new phenomenon - and it's not.

I'm not sure why you're so very angry or why you believe you need to personally protect Michelle Obama from commentary you find offensive, but I am sure you're over-reacting to my post.

Bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No. You made the assumption that I think this is something new when I said that this has been going
on for quite some time.

I'm sorry if I seemed angry when I thought my response to you was pretty silly.

Still, I'm pretty sick of the way people will bash a woman over clothing, hair, shoes, hips, exposed arms, tone of voice, the kind of food she feeds her kids, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I think that people target easy things when they are worried about
things that are difficult to resolve - a form of projection, perhaps. First ladies have always come under intense scrutiny and probably always will; I suspect that the same will occur if we ever manage to elect a woman as President (since 'single' anything seems to be an automatic disqualifier). It is annoying but it's almost part of the job description. Think about what even the most recent first ladies have had to put up with during their husbands' terms in office. Even Jackie Kennedy, who managed to impress most people with her dress sense, was criticised for her attitude and hair style (among other things).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fashion is one of the worst aspects of consumer capitalism.
Substitute "trendy" for fashion in 95% of sentences it occurs in and "trendy" fits perfectly.

Being fashionable/trendy is mostly an adornment behavior to improve the appearance of mainstream "fitness" measures...do you have money, do you know how to spend it, do you know how to look better than your competition (why do you HAVE competition?).

If fashionable makes you feel good, why should I care? Actually I don't, be fashionable. The Purple Heart, Salvation Army, St. Vincent DePaul will all be perfectly glad to take your cast-offs when they become unfashionable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear fucking God
The world is literally falling apart economically and there are people who want to discuss the First Lady's sneakers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Indeed there are such people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm a gem cutter heres a hint. If you want some nice looking jewelry
with real stones that you can buy cheaper than in a regular jewelry store, attend a gem show near you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thank you!!! Always good to get tips from those in the know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. They do...
But the problem, which you refuse to see, is that Michelle Obama wasn't talking about how she liked to mix and match J Crew with Lanvin. Lanvin ain't J Crew. And I'm not talking about the shoes. Read the story again. Maybe she bought the Lanvin tops at a resale shop. Maybe the Lanvin sneakers were a gift. Maybe she just got caught with her sneakers showing? Maybe she needs a new press secretary?

That's who I really blame if I am going to blame anyone. Looking back all the first ladies seem to have a rough ride in the beginning. Usually with the Washington press corps. Usually the result of the press secretary not realizing the press corps is out for blood and headlines.

Nancy Reagan didn't realize the shooting of a doctor in Georgetown was such a big deal to the press corps when she started talking about her "itty bitty gun that shot itty bitty bullets."

Hillary Clinton as I recall got criticized over her "look" and then got criticized again when she changed it.

Laura Bush as I recall got criticized over her "look" and then got criticized again when she didn't change it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Wow, you're so concerned.
I can tell you really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. I understood your post EmilyAnne. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow. People still want to talk about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC