From the Los Angeles TimesEditorial
Getting rid of bad teachersOne sensible approach: change the makeup of appeals boards that review teacher firings.
May 5, 2009
(...)
Teachers unions have legitimate gripes of their own. Too many principals don't evaluate teachers properly, or they allow petty personal grievances to interfere with their judgment. But even if the district got it all right, United Teachers Los Angeles would still be vigorously defending the bad apples. That's its job; the public's job is to insist on the best possible teachers.
Striking a balance between students' rights and legitimate job protection can be tricky, but it also is achievable. In coming months, this page will examine workable remedies at the state, local and national levels.
The first solution, though, is so obvious and fair to both sides that there should be no need for debate: The panel that hears all appeals of teacher firings must be altered to reflect the interests of students and parents as well as teachers, and these hearings should take place within a year after a district first moves to fire a teacher. Instead of placing two teachers on the panel with an administrative law judge, there should be a teacher and a representative from an independent parents organization.
The L.A. Unified school board backed off last week from asking the Legislature to fix that problem, but California lawmakers shouldn't need an invitation.
--
Los Angeles TimesWhile the editorial appears to be even-handed, the LA Times has yet to publish an editorial about real problems facing education, such as superstitious beliefs disguised as science and privatization.
Until the LA Times is able to cover public school education objectively, they can go fuck themselves.