So 3 thoughts about the naked pictures of that idiot Miss California who says she was '17'

[LynneSin]

Thought #1: Most photographers of somewhat decent reputation aren't going to make porno-type pictures with a girl that was 17 years of age. Even "Girls Gone Wild" Joe Francis does his best to screen the ages of girls before putting them on his schlock videos. So if the photographer did know Carrie Prejean was 17 years old - what the hell was she doing hanging out with low-life sleazebags like that? If she was 17, where were her parents when Carrie opted to get photographs done. She says it's normal for a girl to do lingerie and swimsuit shots, but an underage girl usually needs parental approval before having any photographs done. And btw Carrie - you could have said "NO". On American Next Top Model during the first season, the 2 christian models felt it wasn't right to be photograhed nude even though nothing private was to be showing and fleshtone coverings were provided just in case something would peak out. Those girl said "no" - why couldn't you?

Thought #2: She lied to the photographer. Perhaps she had a fake ID. It's possible. A Christian lie? For shame

Thought #3: Perhaps she wasn't 17. Why would a photographer, knowing he'd face jail time and a life on the sex offenders list, risk his/her reputation and release these pictures unless he/she knew the age of Carrie Prejean at that time.

Just a thought.

[county worker]

1. What I saw are not porno pictures. They were pictures that models do and they are used for future

possible jobs. I had a friend who's daughter's best friend was a model. She appeared topless in an A&F ad when she was 16. It was in a fashion mag.

[WeDidIt]

5. You haven't seen teh unreleased photos

They were going to release all four. All that hit the internet was the least explicit.

The others are more explicit full frontal topless shots.

she's claiming she was 17. Apparently the photographer who took the photos went through a backdoor route to get them out there is was unaware somebody else had copies (possible a Prejean ex-boyfriend?)

The way we know she's lying will be if we see the full portfolio because the photographer who took the photos must know the authorities will investigate him due to her claims of being 17 when they were taken. I'll bet anything he has the date of the photo shoot very well documented as well as copies of her driver's license with the date of the photo shoot documented on the copy.

[ShortnFiery]

6. They were soft porn-like. Not for 17 year olds.

Kick her smarmy right wing fundy butt out of anything having to do with "Miss California."

I thought I'd never type this, but she gives "Beauty Queens" a bad reputation. :wow: :P

[madaboutharry]

7. But didn't a parent still need to sign a document

granting permission? I think that is the issue here.

I think she is going to need to show some kind of document that she was in fact 17 and had parental approval. Regardless, the whole thing is a big mess and she brought it on herself. She thinks she is smart but she isn't. She just got away with being dumb because she is pretty.

[county worker]

11. I believe all that is taken care of when you sign with an agency.

[graywarrior]

2. I like to keep the focus on her bigotry.

[LynneSin]

8. But the hypocrisy is even more important in regards to the bigotry

Like I said at the end - "Judge not lest ye be Judged". I think Jesus said that.

[graywarrior]

13. I'll bet it goes right over her head.

She believes she's a God Warrior, I'm sure

[plcdude]

15. well you're

"grey's" warrior just sayin

[graywarrior]

16. Them "grey's" are all up in your face, too.

[ColbertWatcher]

19. I bet she "discovered" her sudden on-set Christianity ...

... when she found out that the pageant people might not like her previous photographic "work".

[WI_DEM]

3. You don't only have to be "christian" not to do nude or semi-nude pictures

I'm sure there are secular women/girls out there who may not feel comfortable doing those types of pictures too.

[LynneSin]

9. In that particular instance the girls were touting all the time they were Christians

but you are right

[Ignis]

14. Sure, but they're not telling others they're going to hell, either. (nt)

[LibDemAlways]

4. I think she is claiming to have been 17 at the time hoping

that will keep other photos off the web. I would be willing to bet she was at least 18 and that what's been posted thus far is nothing compared to what's out there.

I agree that no photographer in his right mind would take semi-nude pictures of an underage girl.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

10. If she sent them to her pals she'd be in trouble for "sexting".

But, hey, she was getting paid for it rather than indulging in unChristian naughtiness.

[sinkingfeeling]

12. TMZ.com refused to publish the other 4 because they were contacted that she was underage in them.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/06/miss-california-carrie-prejean-gay-marriage-underwear-panties-topless-photos/

Carrie is not telling the truth. Last Sunday, someone sent TMZ 4 -- FOUR -- photos of Carrie without her top and in her panties. We did not publish the pics after her rep contacted us and said she was 17 when the pics were taken.

[rocktivity]

17. The rep may be lying to keep them from being published

And unless the photog can prove that Carrie claimed she was 18, he certainly isn't going to incriminate himself by collaborating the rep's story. But I really don't care how old she was--I care the she knew the photos existed, that the pageant rules forbid them, and that she entered the pageant anyway. It's getting harder and harder to tell if she's that big a hypocrite or that big an idiot.

:headbang:
rocktivity

[TahitiNut]

18. As far as I can tell, her cognitive shortcomings are secondary to her character shortcomings.

That she's both a liar and a hypocrite seems most clear. That she's devoid of the kind of healthy self-esteem that would lead to a sense of responsibility and integrity would appear to be the crux of the matter. Narcissism? Yup.