|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Newsjock
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:04 PM Original message |
Wash Post ombudsman debunks Edwards house story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. And quite honestly the faux outrage on DU over this idiotic story.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So is the undying loyalty (hypocrisy?) of those who choose to explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. THIS thread is about the SALE of Edwards' old house and the news story about it. NOT the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's all related to work out to "an apology" that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
37. are you high or just some thug like political opperative type? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Deacon
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. So, It's "Populist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. No, but a little more modest abode would not have drawn such attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Correct sir! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. How modest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:21 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I think they mean a house like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. LOL....if you want to work yourself into a tizzy about it, have at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes, attack the person when you've lost the arguement? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I would respond that I am laughing WITH you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jan-29-07 07:25 AM Response to Reply #11 |
36. You mean Babs doesn't wear burlap? Shock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Yeah - populists should live humbly, like the Roosevelts did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. This is the 21st Century where our Representatives' Excesses make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. LOL - you think no one knew where the Roosevelts came from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cilla4progress
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Agreeing with SnF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You're welcome to support the dour puritanical candidate of your choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cilla4progress
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Thank you - I intend to! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. You keep metioning dour Puritans. Edwards does not believe in gay rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Not quite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Oh my, let's both run for cover? Time will tell folks, really. Peace! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. I didn't know that along with admittance to the bar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hashibabba
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Why don't you admit its none of your business and Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Next up: Hillary spent more on her new shoes than you have in the last 20 years! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. How dare she wear shoes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. It is truly sad the minutia that some people think is important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cilla4progress
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Wow - flame on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. You are correct....it's still a free country and you are free... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cilla4progress
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Thank you - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. Back off. Senator Clinton wears fair trade hairshirts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
29. This whole thing is nothing more than a B.S. rethuglican meme. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. Howell still can't get it right. Her opening sentence is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm glad the Washington Post acknowledged this because that article was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sat Jan-27-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
30. Yeah - but did they debunk his positions on Iraq and Iran? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC