|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:47 AM Original message |
There you have it: Dick Cheney says he is not willing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. oh yeah...we'll see about that...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. It is a toss-up whether I detest this man more than his disdain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. He'll get his day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. i hope he doesnt die before i get to see him squirm...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I'd be willing to put money on that bet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. If I was the praying type I'd be praying and I'd be giving away all my future first borns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Actual quote: "I'd have to take a look at the precedent we'd be setting." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Precedent... Bill Clinton's witch hunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Before a Grand Jury, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Yep, sure would hate to set a precedent of holding criminals accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. What precedent? How about Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. That's why a Grand Jury investigation would be preferable to a Congressional one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. Saying what everyone already knew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bush has already said he DOESN'T testify under oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Or by the GOP elephant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. Then I'll guess we'll just have to waterboard him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
10. Oath? That's for commoners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
11. who the F*** does this arrogant ass think he is??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
12. Gee, I guess they'll be sorry they destroyed what was left of "Executive Privelege" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. Scheiffer is kickin butt!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
16. In jail for contempt or in jail for war crimes = in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Here's the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
17. he says the proof he's innocent is in memos..that dont exist.. cant call clinton slick anymore,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
22. And nobody can make him testify.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
23. and if he gets handed a supboena he will just ignore it like Rove did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Screw Conyers and the congressional investigation. We need a special prosecutor and a Grand Jury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
26. That's ok. So far, I haven't seen anyone that willing to put him on the stand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
27. I'm jealous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. TORTURE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:40 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Thanks nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. That's why Wanda's analogy last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. That's the "joke" Wanda Sykes made last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
28. Go fuck yourself, dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
31. We've been down this road before, the terrain is boringly familiar.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. Fuck you, you cutless coward! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
38. i'll take that as an admission of guilt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-10-09 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
39. He's right, he shouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC