Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guess WHY Ari was eager to hit Fitz up for immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:29 PM
Original message
Guess WHY Ari was eager to hit Fitz up for immunity
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 12:37 PM by Rose Siding
Slate's live blogger relates this nugget, occurring after Libby's lawyers insist that the jury be made aware of Fleischer's deal with the prosecution-

And here Fitzgerald makes a nice little chess move: Fine, he says, we can acknowledge that Fleischer sought immunity. As long as we explain why. Turns out Fleischer saw a story in the Washington Post suggesting that anyone who revealed Valerie Plame's identity might be subject to the death penalty. And he freaked. Of course, if Fleischer was this worked up about it during the time period in question, that suggests Libby would have been, too. (Which again undermines the notion that Libby had much bigger fish to fry.)

http://www.slate.com/id/2158157/entry/2158330/


The public face of the White House was so freaked about being EXECUTED that he sought immunity? That's pretty freaking HUGH!!!!1!, if you ask me.

The blogger's parenthetical observation is also fascinating. If the comparatively lowly press sec was thinking that way, how much more might veep's CoS be, not only aware of, but (contrary to Libby's chief line of "gosh I was too busy to care" defense) consumed by the whole situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why Isn't There A Front Page Screaming Headline
To the effect of: "Plame Leaker Subject to Death Penalty"?

Damn liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, the Post did write about it. At that point it would have just
been analysis. Then, the penalty sort of became moot once bush made a big to-do about how he'd declassified some of the information -in a very unusual way as I recall. That could ALSO have been in reaction to the real penalties for the crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ari isn't alone
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 12:38 PM by EVDebs
Chalabi 'boasted of Iranian spy link'
Iraqi accused by CIA made claim in 1997, says former inspector

Julian Borger in Washington
Wednesday May 26, 2004
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1224717,00.html

and this quote by Pat Lang:

""Patrick Lang, former head of the CIA's Middle East desk, told Newsday that the U.S.-funded INC "intelligence collection" program had essentially functioned as an Iranian spy network:

"'They knew exactly what we were up to,' he said. Lang described it as 'one of the most sophisticated and successful intelligence operations in history...I'm a spook. I appreciate good work. This was good work.'" ""-- from

The Interrogation of George W. Bush
The Plame Affair, Chalabi's lies, and the Niger uranium forgeries: connecting the dots
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=2876

shows us that many in the Pentagon and the WhiteHouse face treason charges. To make matters worse for the WH, just start digging into a company called Ptech (now known as GoAgile) and 9-11's wargames, the FAA and AirForce software infrastructure.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So we rewarded Chalabi the Iranian spy?
And now we want to invade Iran...but Iran knows all about our Air Force SOFTWARE???????????????????

Which is used to .... what? Write letters? CONTROL BOMBERS?

Well, what a fun invasion that will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Related DU posting about that FAA, Air Force software...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3221#3234

Saudi AND Iranian intell ? You scratch mine, I'll scratch yours ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. ahh, lesson time for upstart empires
Never, Never, assume that countries that have had continuous governments for 2,500+ years are simple, backward people. They had sophisticated spy agencies while people in Europe were still stealing cattle and whacking each other with iron swords.

:evilgrin:

Persians not dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a pretty little nugget.
I'd like to find it a setting and wear it as jewelry.

Is it POSSIBLE that BushCo did NOT have a meeting where they discussed the possible outcome of having committed treason?

Bush flat out lied to the country about the Plame investigation. Was he in the habit of lying without knowing exactly why he had to?

"George, Ari wants to quit and find a lawyer because he's worried about being executed."

"Did you tell him it's cool, I can pardon everybody?"

"He seems not to trust you anymore, George."

"Dump him. Does he travel in small planes?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. GHW Bush says that outing a CIA is the most treasonous act one can commit.
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 12:53 PM by Old and In the Way
Now that was probably said to cover his own tracks, but I wonder what he has to say about outing an entire CIA network devoted to tracking WMD in the Middle East? If that's not treason, I don't know what it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ari should have watched what he said and watched what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh NO YOU DIDN'T! Snap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. The article said the Judge was fed up at the end
Did I miss the part where the Judge decided what would and would not be admissible? IOW, was there a final decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC