Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If John Boehner & Kit Bond know that the CIA was telling the truth to Congress..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:18 AM
Original message
If John Boehner & Kit Bond know that the CIA was telling the truth to Congress..
...then THEY, when THEY were in the majority, were told about the waterboarding. And, THEY are guilty of covering up war crimes.

People who live in glass houses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. good luck getting the media to say any of that. they want to blame the dems for this...
and so that is all we are going to hear. see, now here is the reason that there shouldn't be only a few owners of all the media in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. My question- In the incestuous atmosphere of the Beltway, when
did the Media know? Are they covering for the CIA and the Republicons, or are they covering for themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:35 AM
Original message
They knew at least in 2004. Sy Hersh was publishing information
at that time. The Abu Ghraib photos were published in spring of 2004 I believe. Bush said the torture was just a few bad apples. Remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I remember
Edited on Sat May-16-09 08:49 AM by elizfeelinggreat
very well.

You didn't even have to make an effort to find it out because Hersh gave many, many interviews about his investigation and what he found out. It was no secret. He was pilloried by the right at the time for making it public.

Hearing the spin that it's on Nancy Pelosi's head is like like living in the twilight zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Excellent question. And we know the answer.
It is CYA time for many right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. What would you call John Boehner & Kit Bond in the real world
A. Barflies
B. Used car Salesmen
C. Carnival barkkkers
D. All of the Above
E. None of the above
F. All of the above including none of the above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. And here is the proof
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/08/national/main3919474.shtml
<snip>
President George W. Bush said Saturday he vetoed legislation that would ban the CIA from using harsh interrogation methods such as waterboarding to break suspected terrorists because it would end practices that have prevented attacks.

"The bill Congress sent me would take away one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror," the president said in his weekly radio address taped for broadcast Saturday. "So today I vetoed it."

The bill provides guidelines for intelligence activities for the year and includes the interrogation requirement. It passed the House in December and the Senate last month.

"This is no time for Congress to abandon practices that have a proven track record of keeping America safe," the president said.

Supporters of the legislation say it would preserve the United States' ability to collect critical intelligence, and raise the country's moral standing abroad.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congress would work to override Mr. Bush's veto next week. "In the final analysis, our ability to lead the world will depend not only on our military might, but on our moral authority," said Pelosi, a California Democrat.

But based on the margin of passage in each chamber, it would be difficult for the Democratic-controlled Congress to turn back the veto. It takes a two-thirds majority, and the House vote was 222-199 and the Senate's was 51-45.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN11636309
<snip>
WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush's fellow Republicans in Congress on Tuesday upheld his veto of a bill to ban the CIA from subjecting enemy detainees to interrogation methods denounced by critics as torture.

A largely party-line vote of 225-188 in the Democratic-led House of Representatives fell short of the needed two-thirds majority to override the president.

Bush maintains that the United States does not torture, but has refused to discuss interrogation techniques, saying that doing so could tip off terrorists.

The CIA has acknowledged using a simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding on three terrorism suspects, including accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, but says it stopped using that method in 2003.

Waterboarding has been condemned by many U.S. lawmakers, human rights groups and foreign countries as a form of torture.

In voting to sustain Bush's veto, Rep. Pete Hoekstra, a Michigan Republican, attacked Democrats for failing to approve a stalled Senate-passed bill that would expand the government's ability to track foreign targets.

"Rather than holding a vote to give terrorists our (interrogation) playbook, Congress should be voting to strengthen the intelligence community's ability to spy on them," Hoekstra said.
------------
Please note that even in 2008 George Bush denied using torture.

------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Exactly
and if journalists would put down the talking points
and start acting their profession
then we might get to the truth of the matter.

Some brave reporting could blow the lid off this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, now, see, that's different...
...because, you see, they made no claim to be against tort... er, enhanced interrogation techniques in the first place.

So, see, they were under no obligation to report it. Because, like, they weren't against it anyway.

So that's okay then.

Or something like that.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I hear that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC