Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much has Nancy Pelosi been damaged by these attacks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:37 AM
Original message
How much has Nancy Pelosi been damaged by these attacks?
Can she still be an effective speaker? Or should she consider stepping down?

What would happen if she were to step down? Would that be the end of the torture investigation or would it add fuel to continuing the investigation? Or will it be forgotten in a few days?

The truth of the matter is that Pelosi brought much of this upon herself. Because she was compromised by this information, she was unable to investigate the Bush Administration and she surprised many liberals when she decided to "take impeachment off the table". Now she is paying the price for her lack of judgement.

If she were to step down, would that be a victory for Dick Cheney and the Republicans? If she stays in her position, will it not be more difficult to discuss the "torture" matter any further? What is your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Think of who
the past few Republican Speakers were - like Tom (INDICTED) DeLay.

Nancy is a saint compared to him.

I don't think she should step down. I just wish she would turn this around on the Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. They are Framing her...she is a TARGET of the BULLY GOP
She will survive and beat them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't you think this has effectively killed the torture investigation?
No one, in either Party, will want to talk about it any more, because of Nancy Pelosi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What makes you think this is about Nancy Pelosi?
Think for a minute. If Nancy had never attended even the SINGLE briefing by the Bush CIA, do you think that we would be discussing treason and war crimes now? That Cheney would be perp walked into a federal court house or to the Hague?

Or is it possible we would simply be talking about some OTHER democrat now?

This isn't about Pelosi, it's about misdirection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. True but...
it has been an effective misdirection. Do you think Nancy would want to continue talking about this or would she prefer to let it drop? Which would you prefer she do? I think she wants the issue to die and it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. She is making the same mistake that Dems in Washington
have made for decades now... they think that the obvious bullshit stories will die off because "no reasonable person" would believe them...

Unfortunately, they are always wrong. The tactic should be to forcefully confront the bullshit (repudiate it, with facts and witnesses) and then call the asshole repukes on their "distraction agenda". Grind it home in interview after interview. Flip it on the repukes until the story is "WHY did republicans try to distract the public from the real issue, the war crimes committed, the motive behind the war crimes, and why aren't we prosecuting these war criminals?"

We can't work with the republican minority, so therefore we must make the republican minority so small as to be inconsequential. A 66+ seat majority in the Senate, a 100+ seat majority in the house, and no chance that another criminal treasonous bastard repuke will ever be President again.

The repukes will be the Washington Generals to our Harlem Globetrotters. Present, but totally ineffective and a source of humor for the fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I would agree but..
I don't think the Democrats, especially Pelosi, has the backbone to do it. I would be very surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. No! I actually think the Repugs have made a strategical error
Remember Nancy has the power to allow Senate investigations, she wasn't going to do it before. Now that the CIA is trying to label her as a lier they also have screwed themselves.

The Repugs have (through their idiocy) have allowed the proverbial can of worms to be openend. Cheney has had a big hand in that also....

No it's all fair game now and I suspect that Nancy is angry now....angry enough to actually let the law work like it's supposed to. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I agree. They ill thought out strategy will backfire on them
They're still functioning as if it was 2003 and haven't realized that they blew their wad so badly that they've become a joke. Nancy will survive this and I think she'll come away with a very tough and hard lesson about her assumptions that the Right are 'colleagues on the other side of the aisle' are really more like cut throats doing anything to save their own asses.

But by attacking her this way they've as much as admitted it was torture after all. Why would they attack her if they thought she supported 'enhanced interrogations' along with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. She gonna call their bluff and demand a TRUTH COMMISSION
which will exonerate her and place blame where it belongs...to the GOP Machine ....

The Bully GOP gonna be SORRYEEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
18.  I hope you are right, opihimoimoi...
But I am very skeptical about it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The GOP are SELFCENTERED ASSHOLES...they care NOT for "COUNTRY FIRST"
They are of the BULLY GROUP...those that are very Selfish and Domineering

They always want THEIR WAY....even if it means the People will suffer....they have no EMPATHY

Classic sign of a BULLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and the WH will let her twist in the wind...........


http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush /

May 15, 2009
Gibbs dodges Pelosi question

The White House wants nothing to do with this Nancy Pelosi fight with the CIA.

Not long after CIA Director Leon Panetta put out a statement sticking by his agency, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dodged a question about whether Pelosi was right in questioning the CIA.

"I think you've heard the president say this a number of times: the best thing we can do is to look forward," Gibbs said. "I appreciate the invitation to get involved in here, but I'm not gonna RSVP,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. and the WH will let her twist in the wind...........


http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush /

May 15, 2009
Gibbs dodges Pelosi question

The White House wants nothing to do with this Nancy Pelosi fight with the CIA.

Not long after CIA Director Leon Panetta put out a statement sticking by his agency, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dodged a question about whether Pelosi was right in questioning the CIA.

"I think you've heard the president say this a number of times: the best thing we can do is to look forward," Gibbs said. "I appreciate the invitation to get involved in here, but I'm not gonna RSVP,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Conditionally Will Support Her Stepping Down
I agree with you that she brought this unto herself with her equivocations and attempts to curry favor from the rethugs. I also think that she seriously damaged by this futile battle with the CIA even if the CIA is in th wrong because not a whole lot of people will summon the courage to stand with her in this. I will, however, support her stepping down if only she will be replaced by a tough leader like Henry Waxman not by Steny Hoyer - who is another compromiser in he mold of Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Most Americans have no clue who Nancy Pelosi is. As to the rest of you post
all she has to do is keep pushing for an investigation.

She needs to call the Republican's bluff.

Bob Graham backs up her account, so I do not believe she is as compromised as you think.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. So do you think she will continue to push for an investigation??
I think she will be quiet as a mouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. She has been calling for some kind of investigation all along. She needs to sharpen her message.
At least that is my understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. She wasn't an effective speaker to start with,
worse now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. when she took impeachment off the table
she exposed her weak spot, and eventually they pounced on it just like the jackals they are. She tried to go along to get along and it just does not work with those people.

I believe she is a good person with good intentions , and that she is right about the torture briefing.

We need a bulldog (maybe Waxman?) as speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The sooner we dump Pelosi, Hoyer, and Reid...
and replace them with individuals who can control our 'weak sister' dinos in both the House and the Senate, the sooner we can start to block the ever-present foolishness of the out-of-control-repugnants.

Nancy killed herself when she dramatically took Impeachment off the table. She had a reason for doing so...and her husband is a war profiteer which doesn't help.

Pelosi, Hoyer, and Reid are absolutely spineless and useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC